Siechem Madurai Panthers withdraws ball-tampering grievance in opposition to R. Ashwin’s Dindigul Dragons

0
22


After the TNPL demanded concrete proof of malpractice following the Siechem Madurai Panthers’ allegations of ball-tampering in opposition to the R. Ashwin-led Dindigul Dragons, the franchise has determined to withdraw the grievance, the league stated on Wednesday.

The panthers had demanded an investigation into the towels used within the event, suggesting that the opponent was utilizing ‘chemical substances’ to change the situation of the ball.

The franchise demanded an investigation into the supply of the towels used within the event and a chemical evaluation to test for any exterior substances used to change the situation of the ball.

In the course of the aforementioned encounter, the Dragons had chased down SMP’s 151-run goal with 9 wickets in hand and over seven overs to spare. Skipper Ashwin scored a 29-ball 49, whereas his opening companion Shivam Singh remained unbeaten on 86 off 41 balls to assist the facet canter to the win.

In response, the TNPL referred to as the allegations ‘unsubstantiated’, requesting the franchise to furnish ‘materials proof’ so as to add to those claims.

ALSO READ | TNPL says ‘no proof’ after Siechem Madurai Panthers accuses R. Ashwin’s Dindigul Dragons of ball tampering

On Wednesday, the league communicated that the Madurai franchise has determined to withdraw its authentic grievance after being requested to comply with the procedural steps for initiating a proper enquiry. 

“Following due consideration, the administration and training workers of SMP have determined to withdraw the grievance within the bigger curiosity of the game and the graceful conduct of the event,” the TNPL launch stated.

“They’ve additional clarified that the intention behind the grievance was to not carry disrepute to Mr. R. Ashwin, captain of the Dindigul Dragons, the Dindigul Dragons staff, the match officers, the TNPL, or the TNCA.

“In gentle of this withdrawal, the matter is deemed closed and no additional motion shall be pursued,” it added.



Source_link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here