Ben Clemens FanGraphs Chat – 2/5/24

0
100


2:00
Ben Clemens: Hey everyone, welcome to the chat
2:01
Ben Clemens: I’ve been fairly unhealthy about these this yr because of a mixture of technical difficulties on my finish after which simply getting out of the behavior of it, however let’s kick issues again off with a very good one
2:01
David: Hello Ben – might you share your ideas on the present state of the Purple Sox?
2:01
Ben Clemens: I’m confused about what their plans are, however I feel on the whole they’re taking part in for the longer term and I feel that’s cheap
2:02
Ben Clemens: It’s not *enjoyable* to try this as a staff just like the Purple Sox, however I feel the best way theyr’e doing it’s sensible
2:02
Ben Clemens: They are going to be aggressive this yr for positive, however with that rotation, they want a very good variety of issues to go proper to make the playoffs
2:03
Ben Clemens: I feel that’s okay, notably since they’re attempting out a number of fascinating new lineup additions and have a powerful farm system that’s beginning to trickle as much as the main league degree
2:03
Ben Clemens: I feel that in the event that they didn’t signal one of many few huge ticket pitching choices this yr, punting their free company strikes till subsequent yr made sense
2:03
Ok DOT: Am I loopy to suppose the Cubs have a nonzero likelihood at signing each Belli and Chapman? One on an extended deal, one on a better AAV quick deal a la Correa’s first Twins contract?
2:04
Ben Clemens: Nonzero, for positive. I don’t suppose it’s THAT excessive, although, simply because I don’t see them spending that a lot
2:05
Ben Clemens: I feel it might make sense provided that the Brewers are principally betting that the Central received’t be robust this yr
2:05
Ben Clemens: they’ve already downgraded on function to enhance future years, it’s not like they will un-trade Burnes now
2:05
Ben Clemens: looks as if it’d be a very good time to pivot because the Cubs but it surely’s a type of I’ll consider it once I see it kinda offers
2:05
the one that asks the lunch query: What’s for lunch?
2:05
Ben Clemens: oh man, it’s a very good one this time. Home made broccoli soften on focaccia
2:06
Rick Manning: Dynasty Keeper League Correa or Neto (trying primairly on the subsequent couple seasons)
2:06
Ben Clemens: I’d maintain Correa however not by a ton
2:06
Ben from DC: Are you able to give me any purpose for hope for my Nationals? Each time I learn information in regards to the staff it’s in regards to the homeowners not promoting, MASN dispute, Strasburg/proprietor battle, and even prospects like Hassell and Inexperienced flaming out. If you happen to squint is there any hope with Abrams/Gore/Grey/Wooden/Crews?
2:07
Ben Clemens: Yeah I feel the hope is principally: Abrams has been higher than anticipated. Crews appears superior. Wooden appeared fairly good in AA as a 20 yr outdated
2:07
Ben Clemens: possibly this huge group of prospects will pan out spectacularly
2:07
Ben Clemens: I do suppose that the staff must get bought, looks as if the Lerners have moved on mentally
2:08
Ben Clemens: And possibly all of the Alexandria enviornment stuff is creating the sort of distraction that retains different DC space enterprise varieties away from bidding on the Nats which slows issues down? Probably not positive if that’s the case or not
2:08
Ben Clemens: However the upside case right here is that simply as all of the expertise from their farm system hits the majors, there’s new possession in place that may’t wait to spend
2:08
RH: Since they have already got Brent Rooker, I feel the A’s ought to simply get as many Mississippi State guys as they will and play in Starkville till Vegas is prepared. At the very least it might be enjoyable.
2:08
Ben Clemens: Appears about as palatable as most of their choices.
2:09
Ben Clemens: I’m wondering in the event that they’d think about taking part in on the rec league softball discipline the place I play
2:09
Ben Clemens: it’s not THAT a lot worse of a taking part in floor than the Coliseum
2:09
Ben Clemens: oh, apart from in case you neglect to get the town to show off the nighttime sprinkler schedule, then the third baseman would possibly get soaked
2:09
Tex Fan: IN 2 years Max Scherzer is ?
2:09
Ok DOT: If Kyle Hendricks has an honest (~150 innings, barely above common period) season, would you give him the QO?
2:09
Ben Clemens: However I might see it both means
2:10
v2micca: Am I loopy in pondering that if a couple of issues break proper for the Reds this yr, Cincinnati might legit take the division?  They’ve a stable core in place, and there isn’t a dominant staff within the NL Central.
2:10
Ben Clemens: I imply, are they favorites? No
2:10
Ben Clemens: However theyr’e within the combine for positive
2:11
The Different David: How do you are feeling about Ben Lindbergh and your editor Meg Rowley referring to you as “The Different Ben” on my favourite podcast, Successfully Wild?
2:11
Ben Clemens: Haha I feel it’s very cheap
2:11
Ben Clemens: I listened to EW for a very long time earlier than I began writing about baseball so it’s nonetheless kinda surreal listening to my title come up in any respect
2:12
Jeremy: Comply with-up to the Purple Sox and Brewers/Cubs questions earlier: to what extent are groups’ selections to rebuild or go all-in depending on the selections of different groups of their division? Are the Purple Sox retooling partly as a result of, someday within the final yr or two, they checked out remainder of the AL East and thought: “The O’s are about to get good, the Jays, Rays, and Yanks are already good. Good time to retool.” Did the Brewers take a look at the remainder of the NL Central and suppose “Good time to commerce Burnes; the Cardinals are retooling and the Cubs don’t look they need to spend cash but”?
2:12
Ben Clemens: If groups aren’t doing that, they’re doing it fallacious, however I positively consider that it enters their minds
2:13
Ben Clemens: I’m unsure if it’s a fundamental driver of  selections or something, however groups completely  take divisional problem and the form of future groups into consideration
2:13
Ben Clemens: I feel it’s kinda robust in Boston’s case b/c let’s be actual, the ALE goes to be a buzzsaw of a division in 5 years identical to it’s now
2:14
Ben Clemens: however Milwaukee has performed a reasonably good job of being opportunistic and pivoting round what’s happening within the central. I feel the Twins do a very good job of this as properly. The Diamondbacks getting extra aggressive this offseason is one other good instance
2:14
diadem: Do projections consider the OBP of the hitters in entrance of them?
2:14
Ben Clemens: Undoubtedly not
2:14
Insert Witty Identify Right here: We missed you Ben. Trying ahead to an awesome 2024 season. That being mentioned, curious to know what about baseball will get you jazzed up probably the most?
2:14
Ben Clemens: I looooooove defensive highlights
2:15
Ben Clemens: I’m actually excited for a yr of Masyn Winn
2:15
Keith: Shocked on the Witt extension?
2:15
Mike: Probabilities the Witt contract is backloaded, given the decide outs included?
2:15
Ben Clemens: I’m a bit of shocked I suppose, however I’ve been the low man on Witt for a very long time and I’m fairly positive I nonetheless underrate him at the same time as I maintain attempting to replace my priors
2:15
Ben Clemens: I would like a bit of extra time for it to sink in
2:15
Chaco: Any rumors or insights on Blake Snell’s potential touchdown spot?
2:15
Rooster Strip: Does the Giants’ commerce of Ross (“Rooster Strip”) Stripling portend some motion on the free agent market? Looks like they stunning a lot should exit and signal a number of SPs, proper? And they’d look much more aggressive for a wild card spot if additionally they have been in a position to signal Chapman.
2:16
Ben Clemens: I feel that Snell to SF seems to be extra probably with buying and selling Stripling
2:16
Ben Clemens: it’d simply be a bizarre transfer to make in case you weren’t planning on backfilling, even when:
2:16
Nate: All of his stats and peripherals recommend Keaton Winn is the subsequent Logan Webb. Am I out of my thoughts for pondering he’s an enormous underdog in that rotation?
2:16
Ben Clemens: I positively don’t agree with this take!
2:16
Ben Clemens: But when Winn is nice
2:17
Ben Clemens: That might assist
2:17
Ben Clemens: Severely, although: Logan Webb completely demolished the minors at each cease
2:18
Ben Clemens: Then he reached the majors at 22. Winn scuffled in AA and AAA over the past two years at 24 and 25
2:18
Ben Clemens: I feel that he’s intriguing for positive, however I don’t see him as a lot of a comp for Webb
2:18
Charlie Murphy: I used to be provided Francisco Alvarez and Eury Perez for Jordan Walker. No brainer proper? I’ve to take it.
2:19
Ben Clemens: i don’t know your league settings or something
2:19
Brooks Robin some: Who has a greater season this yr amongst these 30 somethings, E. Suarez, M. Chapman, or Rendon?
2:19
Ben Clemens: I’m gonna take Rendon actdually
2:19
Ben Clemens: I feel that is perhaps foolish
2:19
Ben Clemens: however I’m kinda down on Chapman and I feel I do know what I’m getting with Suarez, which is an above common common however nothing extra
2:19
The Different Ben in DC: On a scale of Nutting to Guggenheim, what kind of proprietor do you count on Rubenstein to be?
2:19
Ben Clemens: I feel above common however not Cohen/Guggenheim tier by any means
2:20
Ben Clemens: I get the lol non-public fairness argument, however individuals have been making that about Peter Seidler too
2:20
Ben Clemens: rising up within the space issues loads
2:21
Ben Clemens: and once you take over a staff at 74, and also you’re simply wildly rich, why would you not need to make it good?
2:21
Ok DOT: @Feinsand

Bobby Witt Jr.’s extension:

2024: $2M
2025: $7M
2026: $13M
2027:  $19M
2028: $30M
2029: $35M
2030: $35M
2031: $35M – participant choice
2032: $35M – participant choice
2033: $35M – participant choice
2034: $35M – participant choice

Membership choice 3 years/$89M:
2035: $33M
2036: $28M
2037: $28M

2:21
Ben Clemens: Yeah, this can be a good construction for Witt
2:22
Ben Clemens: I like these sorts of extensions a LOT, I really feel like we’ve gotten to a spot the place groups and gamers can negotiate early-career extensions with out them being excessively one-sided (in both route)
2:22
norm: Who you bought difficult the Twins this yr for the central Tigers or CLE? I feel each of them are sort of sneaky fascinating and Twins pitching depth doesn’t persuade me
2:22
Ben Clemens: I like what they’ve been doing
2:23
Ben Clemens: Think about them with Isaac Paredes (probably not but it surely’s simply enjoyable to maintain pointing that one out)
2:23
Cody Bellinger: Does it actually make sense for the cubs to signal me to any kind of long run deal, even when it is available in with a decrease AAV than boras desires?
2:23
Ben Clemens: In my view? Completely
2:25
Visitor: Twins followers all over the place tremendous excited to see the promise to reinvest the Polanco financial savings has netted them….a 37 yr outdated DH
2:25
Ben Clemens: Given the dimensions of the financial savings, I’m unsure what you anticipated
2:26
Ben Clemens: That mentioned, I feel it’s a reasonably sensible transfer
2:26
Ben Clemens: The Twins don’t spend as a lot as I’d like them to
2:26
Ben Clemens: however I really feel like few groups do a greater job of successful trades with out donig the entire ‘we’ll commerce you 1 / 4 right now for 4 dime-level prospects’ deal the place you’ll be able to’t assist however win
2:27
Ben Clemens: and I feel that additionally they do a very good job of then integrating these trades into their staff
2:27
Ben Clemens: I like the place they’re headed principally
2:27
Doug: Padres actually going to fill their OF/DH spots with NRI varieties and prospects which have barely performed above A ball and will likely be out of place?
2:27
Ben Clemens: It positively seems to be that means!
2:27
Ben Clemens: Doesn’t actually really feel like a recipe to success for me
2:27
Father Padre: Witt or Tatis on their present contracts, who would you reasonably have?
2:27
Ben Clemens: I’d take Tatis however I guess you most individuals would take Witt
2:27
Eric: May you elaborate on why you’re the low man on Witt?
2:28
Ben Clemens: Numerous it comes all the way down to probably not trusting his method on the plate
2:28
Ben Clemens: He’s an outstanding hitter and athlete however I feel his pitch recognition might be a 40 or so
2:29
Ben Clemens: and that simply places a TON of stress on his bat velocity/bat management
2:29
Ben Clemens: it’s actually onerous to have a swing profile like his and hit for energy with out hanging out loads
2:30
Ben Clemens: possibly he can do it, once more he’s a premium expertise, however to actually be a star with no full offensive overhaul he has to maintain placing up these wonderful numbers on contact and in addition add worth along with his protection and legs
2:30
Ben Clemens: legs are a given, I’m positively much less bought on protection
2:31
Ben Clemens: Statcast had him as among the best shortstops in baseball a yr after being one of many worst, DRS thinks he went from abysmal to unhealthy, Prospectus agrees with DRS
2:32
Visitor: Have  you guys thought of spending much less time on the cutesy-poo headlines and extra time writing higher articles?
2:32
Ben Clemens: Thought of it, determined to not
2:33
Ben Clemens: My regular workflow is 10 hours a day on headlines after which I bang out the article in quarter-hour
2:33
Mark: What to anticipate of Eury Perez in 2024?
2:33
Ben Clemens: I count on him to be a high pitcher whose innings are restricted
2:33
JJ Hardy’s Ghost: If you happen to have been the Orioles, Who would you attempt to lock as much as an extension first: Adley, Gunnar or Burnes?
2:33
Ben Clemens: you recognize, I all the time thought JJ Hardy’s ghost could be a Brewers fan
2:33
Ben Clemens: however Gunnar for me
2:33
Ben Clemens: by the narrowest of margins forward of Adley
2:34
Ben Clemens: I feel that most likely what is going to occur is that one or each of them say no they usually transfer on to Burnes
2:34
Ben Clemens: who may also say no
2:34
Ok DOT: All of what you mentioned in regards to the Twins makes it much more infuriating that they don’t spend
2:34
DisgruntledClevelander: It’s sort of onerous to select something however the Tigers for that given how little the Guardians have performed this offseason. Useless even by their requirements.
2:34
Ben Clemens: Actually superb how little the Guardians have performed
2:34
wheelhouse: what do you consider volpe going into yr 2? suppose individuals aren’t actually partaking with how unhealthy he was in yr 1 even by rookie requirements, however unsure how a lot enchancment to count on. appears like anybody projecting him for a leap is setting themselves as much as be underwhelmed
2:36
Ben Clemens: I don’t actually agree with this; I feel that the streakiness of his season made it really feel worse than it was. I additionally be ok with his protection, which makes it loads simpler to tolerate some weak point offensively
2:37
Ben Clemens: Projection programs have him as roughly a median hitter this yr largely because of some enhancements in strikeout charge, which is sensible to me
2:37
Ben Clemens: and as a 3 win participant give or take
2:37
Ben Clemens: a variety of that may come all the way down to non-hitting elements of his recreation for positive
2:37
Caleigh: Do the Yankees circle again to Snell or are they performed for now?
2:37
Ben Clemens: I feel they’re performed
2:38
rm: Do you belief the yr to yr stroll of defensive metrics for infielders greater than outfielders given the upper variety of probabilities?
2:38
Ben Clemens: I feel that outfield likelihood is loads simpler to measure
2:38
Ben Clemens: I additionally suppose that defensive metrics are simply going to be unavoidably noisy
2:38
Ben Clemens: even in case you might measure what occurred on the sector with good precision, the variation in talent and sort of likelihood is significant
2:38
Willy Adames: Am I on the block? Who’s gettin’ me and for what?
2:38
Ben Clemens: I’m kinda unsure on this one
2:39
Ben Clemens: positive, buying and selling Burnes indicators that the Brewers need to the longer term
2:39
Ben Clemens: however they’ve all the time operated with one foot within the now and one in tomorrow
2:39
Ben Clemens: and the return for Adames would probably not be a lot larger than the comp choose they’re presumably getting for a QO
2:39
Ben Clemens: onerous for me to think about that their long-term pursuits are served by buying and selling him for not a lot, they nonetheless do must make the playoffs this yr
2:40
Constanza’s Licked Bat: It’s the yr 2050. The icecaps have melted, and dozens of former cities at the moment are underwater.

Which members of the 2024 Atlanta Braves are within the Corridor of Fame?

2:40
Ben Clemens: Ooh good query
2:41
Ben Clemens: I’ve received: Acuna, Harris II, Strider, Riley
2:41
Ben Clemens: Clearly Acuna is an efficient guess, the remainder are kinda crapshoots imo
2:41
Tacoby Bellsbury: Which staff’s lack of spending is most infuriating?
2:42
Ben Clemens: It WAS the Orioles
2:42
Ben Clemens: gonna give them a go for now in fact
2:42
Ben Clemens: For me it’s the Pirates
2:42
Ben Clemens: they’ve mentioned up to now that they wish to maintain payroll on the degree of gate receipts
2:42
Ben Clemens: Nutting should be raking within the money over there
2:42
Ok DOT: Strider for the HOF is extremely daring, proper? His odds should be underneath 20% proper now
2:42
Ghinga: Why do you suppose Riley particularly?  I can see the opposite ones, however probably not Riley.
2:43
Ben Clemens: Do you suppose a variety of the opposite gamers there are above 20%? I don’t actually
2:43
Ben Clemens: it’s robust to make the corridor of fame
2:43
Ben Clemens: and I simply see Riley because the sort of man who will find yourself with some gaudy profession numbers in a means that’s each old-fashioned and new college pleasant
2:45
Ben Clemens: tons of homers at a non-1b defensive place, absolutely loads of longevity provided that he’s 2500 PA’s in at age 26, his peak might be actually stable
2:45
Ghinga: Do you suppose his protection will damage these probabilities?
2:45
Ben Clemens: no, as a result of I feel it has improved loads
2:45
Visitor: Age 26 David Wright crushes Riley. Riley’s received a protracted, lengthy, lengthy method to go.
2:45
Ben Clemens: i’m not saying he’s 50% to make the corridor of fame even
2:45
Ben Clemens: however David Wright had a phenomenally unfortunate run-out on his profession
2:45
Cautiously-optimistic M’s Fan: Everybody can agree that the Mariners budgetary restrictions are hogswallop and the staff’s possession is embarrassing… with that being mentioned, am I fallacious for pondering Jerry Dipoto has put the Mariners in a reasonably stable place to achieve 2024 along with his offseason maneuvering? The Polanco and Soto additions have me excited
2:46
Ben Clemens: Yeah I agree with this sentiment
2:46
Ben Clemens: I feel given the foolish restrictions, he did fairly properly
2:46
Ben Clemens: I’m not bought on the Santos commerce particularly, however I’m prepared to be satisfied
2:48
Jason: Hello Ben, I hope you’ve had a pleasant low season up to now. I used to be questioning what your present expectations are for the Diamondbacks this season?
2:48
Ben Clemens: Compete for the division and make the playoffs
2:49
Marcos: Choose one participant from the 2015 Royals or 2016 Cubs for the Corridor of Fame.
2:50
Ben Clemens: Aroldis Chapman
2:50
Ben Clemens: man, that’s a boring choose
2:50
Ben Clemens: however I don’t see every other apparent ones and I might see Chapman ending up with a type of ‘yeah okay high-quality he was simply such a key reliever for thus lengthy’ sort of issues
2:50
Ben Clemens: is dependent upon how reliever circumstances for HoF evolve over time clearly
2:50
Ben Clemens: however I don’t see every other nice choices
2:50
Ok DOT: I do know the numbers aren’t fairly there, however Anthony Rizzo has Veteran’s committee written throughout him
2:50
Ben Clemens: He was my second alternative
2:50
Cody: Do you suppose Theo coming again to Boston could have a major influence on the franchise transferring ahead? I’m enthusiastic about his return, however unsure how a lot management he could have.
2:50
Ben Clemens: Not relaly, to be trustworthy
2:51
Ben Clemens: Feels like he’s going to bop round between all of the groups within the fenway orbit and supply common recommendation on greatest practices
2:51
Ben Clemens: which is neat however most likely not the knid of factor that makes you higher immediately
2:51
wheelhouse: on volpe: my skepticism of his offense is on not having any hitting talent to hold his hat on. his exit velo is okay not nice, his contact charges are okay not nice, his swing selections, pitch recognition, batted ball profile all okay not nice. pulls the ball, good, however 59% grounders when he pulls, GB/FB 2.59. it’s not a profile that has one evident flaw that if he addresses it, every thing else comes collectively.
2:51
Ben Clemens: Yeah completely truthful
2:52
Ben Clemens: it does imply that he doesn’t have a single level of failure, however I feel his carrying device is simply usually swing selections and bat management given these selections
2:52
Ben Clemens: which is admittedly sort of a nebulous profile
2:52
Ghinga: Numerous deal with the o’s this yr, and rightfully so.  Who within the Al east do you suppose has the most effective likelihood of successful the division apart from them?
2:52
Ben Clemens: I feel the Yankees
2:52
Ben Clemens: Nevertheless it’s going to be a extremely aggressive division
2:54
Ben Clemens: Our odds are popping out this week and I count on the Yankees to be the favourite given what the projections are sayihng proper now
2:55
Ben Clemens: Simply by projected WAR, which isn’t the identical as playoff odds, 4 of the 5 groups within the ALE are within the high 11 in baseball
2:55
Duece: I might guess Jon Lester earlier than Chapman, however I agree we have to watch the place the pitching citizens goes.
2:55
Ben Clemens: I’d have had him third after Rizzo
2:55
Ben Clemens: simply not a excessive sufficient peak for me, however I might positively be fallacious
2:55
Ben Clemens: and we’re dealing in lengthy pictures it doesn’t matter what
2:55
CFH: Do you suppose it’s simpler to enhance a staff with a stars-and-scrubs building? Looks like Verdugo and Grisham (even earlier than you account for Soto) are large upgrades over the Yankees negative-WAR outfielders apart from Decide from final yr whereas it’s a lot tougher for a staff just like the Giants to make an improve like that as a result of they’re about common all over the place and would want to herald stars
2:55
Ben Clemens: I completely do
2:56
Ben Clemens: the Giants and Cardinals are my go-to examples of groups which have bother bettering with particular person strikes b/c they’ve already performed so properly on the straightforward holes to patch
2:56
Ben Clemens: It’s like in case you’re attempting to extend the worth of a house by renovating it
2:56
Ben Clemens: if every thing already seems to be good, it’s tougher to make a straightforward repair. If certainly one of your bogs is 30 years outdated, properly there you go, simply getting that factor trying cheap will do it
2:56
Visitor: Riley goes into his age 27 season and he’s solely received 15-18 WAR. Solely 3 good seasons- superb seasons, however not nice seasons. If he places up 5 WAR yearly for six extra years, via his age 32 season, he’s nonetheless beneath Wright’s profession numbers. So, he’s received to be wholesome and constant for that lengthy after which be capable to proceed accumulating past that. It’s loads to count on from a man who received a late begin, is just not an awesome defender, and has meh plate self-discipline.
2:57
Ben Clemens: The query wasn’t which gamers on the Braves are prone to make the corridor of fame
2:57
Ben Clemens: that’s Acuna and nobody else imo
2:57
Ben Clemens: I don’t suppose Riley is prone to make the corridor of fame
2:57
Ben Clemens: I don’t suppose Matt Olson is mORE probably, although
2:57
Ben Clemens: and to be clear, I don’t suppose ‘David Wright was higher’ is an efficient argument
2:57
Ben Clemens: if he didn’t have his profession reduce quick by harm he’d most likely be a corridor of famer
2:58
Tom: Is there something for Giants followers to stay up for? I’m dooming in regards to the Dodgers signing world beaters and SF getting a slap hitting outfielder
2:59
Ben Clemens: I feel it’s actually enjoyable to look at Logan Webb
2:59
Ben Clemens: Luis Matos is enjoyable, the staff virtually all the time has immaculate vibes
2:59
Ben Clemens: However yeah, bummer of an offseason
2:59
Phil: Which members of the 2024 Atlanta Braves are within the Corridor of Fame?  That was the query…it kinda was which members of the Braves are prone to make the corridor grinning
2:59
Ben Clemens: Ha properly, truthful sufficient
2:59
Ben Clemens: Okay how about this
3:00
Ben Clemens: not a really fascinating reply, oh properly
3:00
Yo-Yo: If the Cardinals win the NLC, it will likely be as a result of this younger participant surpassed expectations and made a huge impact:
3:00
Ben Clemens: However runner up: nobody they usually simply win b/c their innings eaters are higher than anticipated
3:00
Reds Enjoyer: Do you hate the Reds rotation as a lot as projections do? Personally appears like there’s no means these guys can all be as unhealthy as they’re collectively being projecte to be…
3:01
Ben Clemens: We now have them because the Seventh-best rotation in baseball
3:01
Visitor: do you suppose the bluejays are nonetheless trying so as to add this offseason?
3:01
Ben Clemens: I believed they have been
3:01
Ben Clemens: however…. at this level, I don’t
3:01
Ben Clemens: I feel they SHOULD
3:01
Purple Sux: Since nobody of their proper thoughts on Yawkey Method can speak themselves into competing for a WC spot…shouldn’t the Sox give fulltime ABs to guys like Duran, Abreu, Valdez, & Rafaela in order that they know what they’ve for once they resolve to spend $1 sooner or later?
3:01
Ben Clemens: Oh I positively would
3:02
Ben Clemens: possibly not all 4, however I’d deal with giving the younger guys ABs
3:02
Zombie One-Legged Invoice Veeck: Now that we’ve seen it in motion for a yr, what’s your opinion on the LF wall in Camden? An excessive amount of? Good? (full disclosure: I feel it’s an terrible eyesore with no bearing on the staff’s luck)
3:02
Ben Clemens: I feel it’s an eyesore however that it most likely made sense to do exactly to maintain the offensive atmosphere in an inexpensive place
3:03
Cody: Is the Javy Baez contract the worst in baseball proper now?
3:03
Ben Clemens: Yeah I feel so
3:03
Ben Clemens: man that one went south rapidly
3:03
Hunter: Am I loopy to suppose Skubal might win the AL Cy Younger this yr? He was actually good as soon as he got here again in July.
3:03
Ben Clemens: You’re definiteliy not
3:03
Ben Clemens: A fast take a look at some odds means that he’s the Seventh-best guess
3:04
Ben Clemens: so the market agrees with you for probably the most half
3:04
Ok DOT: Strasburg contract?
3:04
Ben Clemens: that’s a contender, but it surely’s mitigated by the way it appears clear that the Nats are getting an insurance coverage payout
3:04
Ben Clemens: the entire retiring unretiring factor suggests a prince fielder situatin
3:04
Visitor: Do you suppose the Pirates might seem like a fringe wild card contender in the event that they exit and signal/commerce for a 2-3 kind beginning pitcher?
3:04
Ben Clemens: I want I did
3:05
Ben Clemens: I feel that this staff is simply too unhealthy for one mid-level pitcher to make things better
3:05
Ben Clemens: Hopefully brighter instances forward and all
3:05
Ben Clemens: However the rotation is DIRE
3:05
Ben Clemens: and it’s not like their offense is lights out
3:06
Himbo: How huge of a believer are you in Chris Sale? Braves appear to be huge believers
3:06
Ben Clemens: I might say I’m a medium believer, however I feel he’s a extremely sensible guess for them given the development of the staff
3:06
Ben Clemens: it simply is sensible to play for upside no matter availability given how loaded they’re
3:08
Sirras: Having my board recreation group over tonight. Any opinion between Monarch, Isle of Skye, and Bloody Inn?
3:09
Ben Clemens: I’ve by no means performed any of those, sadly
3:09
Ben Clemens: I’ve heard actually good issues about Bloody Inn although
3:09
Ben Clemens: so I suppose that?
3:09
Ben Clemens: I simply spent 6 hours taking part in Frosthaven yday so I’m wildly board gamed out in the intervening time
3:09
Austin Riley’s HoF plaque: Identical query Himbo had about Sale, however for Kelenic
3:09
Ben Clemens: Now this one is a toughie
3:10
Ben Clemens: I’m not as huge of a believer in Kelenic as Atlanta, however I do suppose that the worth was cheap and that it’s sensible to attempt issues like that in case you’re given the chance
3:10
Ben Clemens: he clearly has a carrying device
3:10
Sirras: Bloody Inn is irritating in one of the best ways – completely designed that you simply all the time want you had another motion per flip. Advocate giving it a shot!
3:10
Ben Clemens: What an awesome pitch for a recreation
3:10
Purple Sux: So am I proper to be indignant each time I see Rob Refsnyder, Pablo Reyes, or Bobby Dalbec contact a bat?
3:10
Ben Clemens: mmmmm…. possibly not Dalbec?
3:10
Ben Clemens: I really feel just like the clay hasn’t fairly dried there
3:10
Ben Clemens: Refsnyder and Reyes, yeah
3:10
Thomas: Do you suppose possibly Cody Bellinger, Matt Chapman and Blake Snell have been simply figments of our creativeness, and the explanation they haven’t signed is that they don’t truly exist?
3:10
Ben Clemens: An inexpensive concept
3:11
Cubs Fan: Are the cubs getting themselves into the giants/cardinals vary the place they’ve a bunch of excellent, not elite gamers the place it will likely be onerous for them to actually add wins to the roster after this season?
3:12
Ben Clemens: They’re, however possibly I’m too low on their farm system
3:13
Ben Clemens: I suppose PCA or Alcantara might be that man
3:13
Morbo: Good afternoon puny people.
3:13
Derek: what proportion of FG writers do you suppose will choose a staff apart from the Dodgers to win the WS this yr? (and the way about apart from the Dodgers or Braves?)
3:13
Ben Clemens: I’m gonna reply the second, Dodgers or Braves
3:13
Ben Clemens: I feel it’s fairly probably that I’ll
3:14
Ben Clemens: I’m with you in pondering that these two groups will likely be a really sturdy consensus
3:14
Ben Clemens: and i feel {that a} larger proportion of writers will choose them than their true odds will likely be
3:14
Ben Clemens: however let’s say… 20%
3:14
Morbo: It’s been awhile since I’ve made a chat: what have I missed the final a number of months?
3:14
Ben Clemens: From me, not a lot! General, you’ve missed some superior chats after which additionally some bizarre discussions of meals from Dan
3:14
greenfrog: Do you suppose Ohtani will break down bodily in a years from an accumulation of accidents, making his 10-year contract an albatross for the Dodgers?
3:15
Ben Clemens: I positively don’t
3:15
Ben Clemens: It’s onerous for his contract to be an albatross given the advertising half of issues
3:15
Ben Clemens: and the truth that he might simply be a extremely good hitter
3:16
Dan: Your a GM of a 500 staff attempting to win a world sequence within the subsequent two years. Your boss says I’ll double your payroll price range and and approve all trades however you must give my grandson 400 at bats a yr. Are you in?
3:16
Ben Clemens: Oh man, good query
3:16
Ben Clemens: I feel I’d most likely be out until the proprietor’s grandson was already a significant leaguer
3:16
Ben Clemens: or like, Robert Hassell the First
3:17
Tyguy: Associated to above: would FG ever think about having writers make their picks extra probabilistically? In different phrases, which staff (in every league, or division, and so on) is most underrated by the prevailing odds of creating playoffs or successful World Sequence? That might be extra fascinating to me vs a regurgitation of principally favorites (everyone knows the Dodgers are stacked!).
3:17
Ben Clemens: Most likely not, however don’t fear, I simply do it anyway
3:17
Baseball Man: Have you ever ever observed a development that groups with elite bullpens overperform within the common season in comparison with projections/expectations? the frequent sentiment was all the time been pitching and protection, however I’m beginning to suppose that locking within the ultimate 3 innings is definitely extra of an indicator. Assume final years orioles — not unimaginable pitching, however that backend of the bullpen was lights out.
3:17
Ben Clemens: I did suppose this however I’ve by no means been capable of finding a lot proof, and Dan hasn’t both
3:17
Eric: Re: PCA. Are Cubs followers who say he can fill a Bellinger-sized complete on the roster simply coping or are they shut sufficient to proper that not getting Bellinger again isn’t that unhealthy for them?
3:17
Ben Clemens: I’m probably not the man to ask about that, however prospect week is coming quickly
3:19
greenfrog: The Blue Jays haven’t received a single postseason recreation throughout their present window of competition. Bichette and VGJ are controllable for 2 extra seasons. Is the entrance workplace utterly blowing this chance to win a WS?
3:19
Ben Clemens: Mmmmm…. I don’t actually know the right way to disentangle unhealthy consequence from unhealthy course of
3:20
Ben Clemens: I did like buying and selling for Berrios on the time
3:20
Ben Clemens: and actually they’d try this deal once more although he’s underwhelmed on the entire
3:20
Ben Clemens: actually the staff has not met expectations although
3:20
Ben Clemens: Alright on that observe, I’ve to move out and make my lunch, however thanks everybody for a pleasant chat right now
3:20
Ben Clemens: Let’s do it once more someday quickly
3:20
Ben Clemens: Have a beautiful week

 

Ben is a author at FanGraphs. He might be discovered on Twitter @_Ben_Clemens.





Supply hyperlink

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here