Because the authorized case between former WWE paralegal Janel Grant and Vince McMahon continues to develop in courtroom, Jasmin St. Claire has weighed in—and she or he’s not holding again.
On Friday, U.S. District Decide Sarah F. Russell denied Grant’s request for early discovery within the lawsuit, however left the door open for her to refile after WWE and McMahon formally transfer to compel arbitration. Whereas the authorized ruling was procedural, it reignited on-line dialogue surrounding Grant’s explosive allegations—and Jasmin St. Claire added her voice to the dialog with two heated posts on X. In her first response, St. Claire accused Grant of manipulating the state of affairs for private achieve.
“She was an opportunist. Did you see the record of presents that he was giving her over that period of time? She stayed in it for so long as she might and perhaps he both didn’t give her what she wished or she had purchaser’s regret. However there’s no means this woman was a sufferer.”
She adopted up with a second publish condemning girls who break NDAs after accepting settlements.
“Loads of these women that signal NDA’s, then breaking it after taking the cash places doing enterprise with girls again by a whole bunch of years. It exhibits that numerous them can’t be trusted.”
Grant filed the lawsuit in January 2024, alleging sexual abuse, trafficking, and coercion by McMahon and negligence by WWE. Her claims led to McMahon’s resignation from WWE and TKO company positions. McMahon has denied all allegations. Grant was paid $3 million in a previous NDA, however argues that settlement was signed below coercive circumstances and mustn’t bind her case to personal arbitration.
Friday’s courtroom resolution doesn’t decide the validity of Grant’s allegations or whether or not the case stays public. It merely pauses her request to assemble proof earlier than WWE and McMahon formally reply. Decide Russell acknowledged that the courtroom is “expressing no opinion” on Grant’s upcoming arguments to keep away from arbitration—however the highlight is way from dimming.
Now, with public figures like Jasmin St. Claire taking such robust positions on-line, the case continues to stir heated debate each inside and outdoors the wrestling world.
Do you agree with Jasmin St. Claire’s tackle Janel Grant’s lawsuit, or do you consider this case deserves to remain within the public eye and go to trial? Pontificate within the feedback and tell us what you suppose.