Welcome to the 2025 Arizona Fall League

0
14


Megan Mendoza/The Republic/USA TODAY NETWORK by way of Imagn Photos

The thirty third Arizona Fall League season opened final night time with a single recreation in Scottsdale. There are future stars within the Fall League yearly, in addition to many extra workmanlike gamers who’re competing for a 40-man roster spot on subsequent yr’s membership. It’s an exquisite league for groups to develop and scout prospects due to the cross part of expertise it tends to incorporate (there are normally a lot of good place participant prospects), its timing (which permits gamers who had been injured in the course of the common season to atone for reps), and its construction (which permits for six weeks of regular appears to be like). Groups virtually at all times take the AFL critically and ship gamers right here who they wish to see extra of, or who they wish to take a look at. Being on the roster is, by itself, a flare. It’s a sign {that a} participant is price taking note of from a scouting standpoint even when I didn’t know the man’s identify till I noticed a roster.

Previewing this league with prospects’ scouting studies dangers placing the cart earlier than the horse as a result of the scouting half has but to occur. I wish to provide the studies I have already got, to play the hits and ensure you have Kevin McGonigle and Josue De Paula studies and gear grades in entrance of you (don’t fear, you’ll), however an enormous a part of the professional scouting train that’s the Arizona Fall League is mining for the deeper minimize prospects, and I can’t inform you who these guys are going to be simply but. However I can present you the preliminary steps I take to arrange to go to the sphere and attempt to systematically unearth these guys, provide the instruments to take action by yourself, and, within the course of, let know you who it’s I’m most curious and excited to be taught extra about for the subsequent six weeks.

The gamers who change into scouting “targets” are likely to fall right into a handful of classes, particularly: Well-known Gamers, Potential Dudes, Floor-Stage Statistical Performers, TrackMan Performers, Gamers Who’ve Walked a Distinctive Path, and Gamers in a Key Roster State of affairs.

The Well-known Gamers are Prime 100 prospects someplace if not at FanGraphs; they had been high-bonus guys after they signed or have already damaged out, and also you most likely know who they’re. Potential Dudes are prospects with burgeoning expertise who would possibly quickly be part of the ranks of the well-known because the business turns into extra assured that the participant certainly profiles as an on a regular basis huge leaguer. That is arguably crucial subset of participant in all the league. I’m going to record and contact on the Well-known Gamers and Potential Dudes for every Arizona Fall League roster beneath, however for in-depth scouting studies, device grades, and video on these guys, you’re going to wish to bookmark the 2025 Arizona Fall League tab on The Board, which Sean Dolinar and I’ve assembled in your comfort. These are pre-existing studies that I’ll add to and replace all through the subsequent six weeks.

The Floor-Stage Statistical Performers are the fellows who had spectacular back-of-the-baseball-card stats this season. You should utilize the customized options on our Minor League Leaderboards to isolate the gamers on rosters and even create your personal statistical classes of curiosity, simply as I’ve completed within the leaderboards linked just under this paragraph. Once more, I’ll contact on the gamers who stood out on this regard for every Fall League squad beneath, however now you’ve the power to entry all of that knowledge very simply. I’ll be referencing these on my laptop computer or telephone all through the autumn (particularly early on) as a manner of familiarizing myself with how the deeper minimize gamers did the throughout common season. Bear in mind, when you open the hyperlinks, you possibly can play with the leaderboards your self, even when it’s simply to isolate who your favourite group despatched:

2025 Arizona Fall League Pitchers Stat Leaderboards
2025 Arizona Fall League Hitters Stat Leaderboard

TrackMan Performers are gamers who stand out due to a unique kind of measurable. Somewhat than their batting common or stolen base totals, right here we’re what I’ll name “expertise evaluation metrics,” knowledge that illustrates bodily prowess as an alternative of on-field efficiency. Who throws onerous? Whose pitches transfer so much? Who has a cool launch level? Who hits the ball the toughest? These are integral points of up to date participant analysis, however there’s no complete public leaderboard for these things; it’s only a factor it’s important to discover a method to entry as a pseudo-journalistic analyst. The information of this kind that my buddies and sources would possibly ship me could be huge. On the backside of this publish, I’ve assembled tables with what I take into account to be essentially the most primary, related subset of this kind of knowledge, and naturally I contact on some standouts within the group sections beneath.

The final two participant classes are subjective in nature. Gamers in Key Roster Conditions would possibly embrace guys who’re probably being showcased for commerce due to a logjam at their place, de-facto rehabbers who want innings in preparation for an enormous league function subsequent yr, gamers who’ll be uncovered to different groups by way of the Rule 5 Draft this offseason in the event that they aren’t added to the 40-man roster, or gamers who’ve been despatched to Arizona to remain lively within the occasion that their ring-chasing guardian membership abruptly wants them as a result of accidents. They’re gamers who a professional scouting division would care about greater than they’d in a vacuum due to these particulars. Distinctive Path gamers would possibly embrace older guys signed out of Indy ball, or guys who’re type of a black field as a result of they’ve been injured so much, or have just lately switched positions or sports activities. Principally, one thing associated to their private background signifies that they nonetheless have developmental ceiling.

Different Stuff For Your Toolkit

The Fall League rosters are right here and are altering on a regular basis. Even within the temporary window between once I began scripting this piece and revealed it, the rosters modified and a few of the tables beneath have a superfluous man or two. Sadly, we don’t have Arizona Fall League stats accessible on FanGraphs. For these it is best to go to the AFL’s web site, which has different cool stuff like pitching probables and hyperlinks to their dwell streams so you possibly can watch the video games. Now let’s contact on gamers from every AFL squad who fall into one in every of these classes. Please be aware that some gamers seem throughout a number of classes.

Glendale Desert Canines (Braves, White Sox, Dodgers, Cardinals, Blue Jays)

Well-known Gamers
Josue De Paula, OF, Los Angeles Dodgers
Hagen Smith, LHP, Chicago White Sox
Braden Montgomery, OF, Chicago White Sox

De Paula is a statuesque 20-year-old outfield prospect with elite plate self-discipline and thrilling long-term energy projection. This month I’ll be scrutinizing his plate protection (most of his good contact comes on pitches proper down the center) and protection, which has been shaky for me prior to now. Smith was a high 5 draft pick of Arkansas in 2024. He has a killer fastball/slider combo, however he struggled with walks and damage in 2025. Is he bettering on this regard, or is it time to mission him as a reliever (William Shatner Within the UnXplained dot GIF)? You’ll discover extra on Montgomery beneath.

Potential Dude(s)
Chen-Wei Lin, RHP, St. Louis Cardinals

Lin, 23, was a notable Taiwanese faculty pitcher who gained stateside publicity by way of the Northwoods and MLB Draft Leagues earlier than he signed with the Cardinals for $500,000 in 2023. He’s a sky-scraping 6-foot-7 righty who’ll contact 100 and has an excellent splitter, however his strike throwing actually backed up this yr. He has mid-rotation stuff and is a possible late bloomer as a strike-thrower due to his measurement.

Floor-Stage Statistical Performers
Venezuelan Blue Jays righty Yondrei Rojas, 22, missed practically three months with damage this yr, however he posted a 0.88 WHIP and 1.43 ERA within the 37.2 innings he threw, and wrapped his season at Double-A New Hampshire. His fastball sits about 96, and Rojas’ tremendous lengthy arms assist him generate six-and-a-half ft of extension although he’s solely 5-foot-10. His slider isn’t nice, and he wants a very good second pitch. Whether or not one could be developed right here would possibly dictate whether or not he finally ends up rostered by Toronto this winter. Braden Montgomery led all AFL hitters in common season doubles with 34. Blue Jays infielder Cutter Coffey slashed .273/.359/.427 in the course of the yr, whereas White Sox 1B/OF Caden Connor (6%) and Cardinals outfielder Travis Honeyman (7%) had low swinging strike charges. White Sox infielder Sam Antonacci had practically as many walks as strikeouts and a 155 wRC+ in a season cut up between Excessive- and Double-A; he additionally stole 48 bases. Braves outfielder Patrick Clohisy stole 79 bases this yr, 20 greater than some other Fall Leaguer.

TrackMan Performer
Braves infielder Jim Jarvis has a notable contact (80%, above common) and energy (40% hard-hit, just under common) combo. Atlanta right-hander LJ McDonough is producing seven ft of extension and likewise has a launch peak just below 5 ft, and I’m actually excited for an in-person peek at what his supply appears to be like like from the aspect.

Key Roster State of affairs
The promotion tempo of hard-throwing Cardinals righty Randel Clemente was accelerated this season, as he climbed three ranges to Double-A in his 40-man platform yr. He has enormous stuff, loud sufficient that he could be of curiosity to groups within the Rule 5 Draft if he shoves for six weeks and is left unprotected, however he struggles with command to the purpose the place he could not stick on a roster even when he’s taken. Blue Jays infielder Josh Kasevich, one of many higher pure contact hitters within the minors, is trying to rebound after a nasty season and put himself within the Blue Jays infield combine for subsequent yr within the occasion Bo Bichette strikes on in free company.

Distinctive Path
Braden Montgomery, a White Sox Prime 100 prospect, was arguably the highest unsigned highschool prospect from his graduating class. He was an thrilling two-way participant at Stanford who ultimately transferred to Texas A&M, the place he targeted on hitting and minimize his strikeouts sufficient to solidify his early-first spherical standing. He turned Boston’s first spherical decide, then was shortly a key side of the Garrett Crochet commerce. He’s a switch-hitting outfielder with plus energy and a show-stopping arm, however Montgomery strikes out so much, and I hope to make use of the subsequent six weeks to higher perceive whether or not this problem will worsen towards huge league velocity.

Mesa Photo voltaic Sox (Athletics, Cubs, Marlins, Yankees, Rays)

Well-known Gamers
PJ Morlando, OF, Miami Marlins
Brailer Guerrero, OF, Tampa Bay Rays
Aidan Smith, OF, Tampa Bay Rays

Morlando had the most effective current energy among the many excessive schoolers within the 2024 draft, absurd BP pop for a hitter his age that allowed him to make huge league parks look small with a wooden bat. He signed for $3.4 million relatively than go to South Carolina, and to date his professional profession has been beset by accidents. A stress response in his again ended his quick professional debut in 2024, then Morlando wanted ulnar nerve transposition surgical procedure within the spring of 2025 earlier than straining his hamstring in Could. Let’s see how he appears to be like the additional he will get away from these accidents. Each of the Rays outfielders have both been on my Prime 100 (in Guerrero’s case) or on others’ prior to now. Each have huge instruments (Guerrero is constructed like an NFL prospect and has huge energy, whereas Smith is sinewy and long-levered with plus pace and long-term energy projection), however their swings are so lengthy that I’m apprehensive each are going to strike out a ton. You possibly can simply as simply embrace them within the subsequent group.

Potential Dude(s)
Karson Milbrandt, RHP, Miami Marlins
Bryce Cunningham, RHP, New York Yankees

Milbrandt signed for simply shy of $1.5 million within the 2022 third spherical relatively than head to Vanderbilt. His growth hasn’t been linear, however the now-21-year-old set a profession finest for innings (90) and Okay% (29%) this yr and reached Double-A. Do his mechanics and really feel for location look starter-y? Cunningham was the Yankees’ second rounder in 2024 however didn’t exceed his junior yr innings whole this season as a result of damage. His changeup performed like a plus-plus pitch this yr. Does he have sufficient of a breaking ball to be thought of a mid-rotation starter prospect?

Floor-Stage Statistical Performers
Infield prospect Joshua Kuroda-Grauer, 22, was the Athletics’ 2024 third rounder out of Rutgers and Okay’d simply 9% of the time this yr. Assessing his potential defensive versatility might be key this Fall League, as he could not have the ability to profile as an on a regular basis second baseman. Cubs catcher Owen Ayers, a 24-year-old out of Marshall, has amongst each the very best pull charges (55%) and lowest groundball charges (37%) within the AFL. Yankees righty Hueston Morrill had a 0.76 ERA on the season.

TrackMan Performers
Rays righty Jadon Bercovich has a fastball with practically 19 inches of induced vertical break and it’s coming from a lower-than-average launch level, if solely by a little bit bit. Brailer Guerrero had a 50% hard-hit charge however averaged simply two levels of launch due to the character of his swing. Marlins outfielder Fenwick Trimble hovered across the huge league common in each contact charge and his energy metrics.

Key Roster State of affairs
Athletics infielder Max Muncy was added to the roster on Opening Day. With Jacob Wilson slated to deal with on a regular basis shortstop duties for the A’s, Muncy is slated to compete with Darell Hernaiz and Brett Harris for taking part in time at second and third base. The business might be watching him this fall with that in thoughts. He’s on the mend from a hand damage and won’t have his typical energy simply but.

Distinctive Path
Rays righty Mason Auer was a two-way prospect who had a nomadic beginner profession (Missouri State, San Jacinto) and have become a 40+ FV prospect as an outfielder after a breakout 2022 season. The next yr he actually began to wrestle making any type of contact, and towards the top of 2024, the Rays moved him again to the mound. He threw simply shy of six innings this yr, a pitch pattern so small that it doesn’t meet the minimal threshold for inclusion on the TrackMan knowledge I pulled to prep. This man is a black field for me proper now. I put a 70 on his outfield arm in highschool and wish to see how he appears to be like airing it out an inning at a time as a reliever.

Peoria Javelinas (Orioles, Reds, Twins, Padres, Mariners)

Well-known Gamers
Rhett Lowder, RHP, Cincinnati Reds
Alfredo Duno, C, Cincinnati Reds
Enrique Bradfield Jr., Baltimore Orioles
Jonny Farmelo, OF, Seattle Mariners

Lowder, the seventh general decide in 2023, is selecting up innings after lacking time with forearm and indirect strains this season. Duno is a toolshed teenage catcher who’s coming off an excellent Low-A season throughout which he was lastly wholesome and productive. The Reds didn’t promote him to Excessive-A towards the top of the yr, so this can be a de facto promotion and might be a take a look at of Duno’s plate self-discipline. Bradfield is a traditional leadoff hitting middle area prospect who turned a family identify throughout his days at Vanderbilt. With Cedric Mullins gone, might he compete for time in middle area subsequent yr? Farmelo is simply 21 and is sort of younger for this league each by way of his age and minor league expertise, as accidents have restricted him to 75 video games since he was drafted in 2023. He has a uncommon mixture of energy and pace, however his bat-to-ball capacity has been robust to nail down as a result of he’s missed a lot time. Are his struggles with strikeouts truly a expertise problem, or are they a small pattern anomaly or maybe the results of but unshaken rust?

Potential Dude(s)
Brandon Winokur, UTIL, Minnesota Twins
Cam Collier, 3B, Cincinnati Reds
Luis De León, LHP, Baltimore Orioles

Winokur is a 6-foot-6, 20-year-old shortstop and middle fielder who hit 17 bombs this yr. He nonetheless hasn’t completely grown into his physique, and will add each energy and coordination as he matures. Hopefully with that can come fewer strikeouts. His Okay% has slowly been trending down every season. He’s a long-term mission with huge ceiling. Collier signed for $5 million in 2022 and has particular lefty uncooked energy, nevertheless it hasn’t been actualized in video games and he hit simply 4 dingers this yr although his underlying TrackMan energy knowledge (115 mph max, 48% hard-hit charge) are wonderful. De León is a high-ceiling’d 22-year-old lefty with a really projectable 6-foot-3 body who was sitting within the 95-97 mph vary in the course of the spring of 2025 earlier than he was shut down firstly of the season with an elbow impingement. His fastball has uphill angle and tail, however De León has little or no really feel for finding it or his plus-plus slider. Although he has a ton of reduction danger, partly as a result of his arm stroke is so lengthy, the way in which De León is constructed and strikes is indicative of a beginning pitcher. He has the ceiling of a mid-rotation arm with uncommon lefty starter velo and two plus secondaries, whereas his flooring appears to be like like Génesis Cabrera.

Floor-Stage Statistical Performers
Alfredo Duno had a 164 wRC+ on the season and hit .287/.430/.518 with 52 extra-base hits. Billy Amick, the Twins’ 2024 second rounder, had a 150 wRC+ and hit .307 in 54 video games at Cedar Rapids. Outfielder Hendry Mendez (traded from Milwaukee to Philly, then later to Minnesota) posted a 5.9% swinging strike charge this yr, among the many better of all Fall Leaguers. Orioles pitcher Tanner Smith generated a ridiculous 67% groundball charge in 37 innings.

TrackMan Performers
Cam Collier hit a ball 115 this yr and had a 48% hard-hit charge although he solely hit 4 homers; persevering with to know what’s occurring there and the way it would possibly get fastened is an enormous deal. Hendry Mendez had a 91% zone contact charge this season. Righty Johan Moreno’s slider generated a 52% miss charge.

Key Roster State of affairs
The Mariners have a bunch of pitchers on the 40-man fringe right here. Marcelo Perez is a strike-throwing 25-year-old out of TCU whose curveball and cutter spearhead a backend starter profile. Stefan Raeth is a misleading, slider-heavy reliever who throws a ton of strikes. Tyler Cleveland is a cool, submarine reduction righty with an enormous sweeper. Any of them might transfer the needle with a dominant fall.

Distinctive Path
Orioles lefty Sayer Diederich started his faculty profession as a pitcher at Nebraska, then turned a two-way man at Southern Nevada for a season earlier than transferring to LSU Shreveport (NAIA) for his closing collegiate season. He went undrafted and performed Indy ball for a yr earlier than the Orioles signed him. He’s 24 however solely made his affiliated debut this yr, putting out 43 in 33.2 innings because of a very good slider.

Salt River Rafters (D-backs, Crimson Sox, Rockies, Angels, Pirates)

Well-known Gamers
Charlie Condon, 3B/OF, Colorado Rockies

Condon had top-of-the-line faculty seasons ever in 2024 and was the third general decide in that draft, signing for over $9 million. I used to be considerably skeptical of Condon’s bat-to-ball capacity earlier than the draft and he struggled so badly instantly after he signed that he slid out of my Prime 100. That fallow interval was defined away as a result of damage, and whereas Condon was significantly better in 2025, he nonetheless Okay’d at a 28% clip at Double-A, and I nonetheless suppose he has a unstable offensive forecast although he clearly has huge energy.

Potential Dude(s)
Tony Blanco Jr., 1B, Pittsburgh Pirates
Jansel Luis, SS, Arizona Diamondbacks
David Hagaman, RHP, Arizona Diamondbacks

Blanco has a few of the finest uncooked energy in all of professional baseball although he’s solely 20 years outdated. He’s already hit a ball 120 mph and had a 113 mph EV90 in 2025, second in professional baseball behind Oneil Cruz. Will he be Aaron Decide? Chris Carter? Or will Blanco make so little contact that he turns right into a Franmil Reyes kind of fringe huge leaguer? Luis is a projectable switch-hitting 20-year-old infielder with superior hand pace, however his Epicurean strategy on the dish has tended to affect his manufacturing. Hagaman got here to Arizona within the Merrill Kelly commerce. He fell in his draft yr as a result of TJ and solely returned to affiliated ball a number of weeks earlier than he was traded. He’s each constructed like and strikes like an enormous league starter, will flash three good pitches, and threw strikes in a comparatively small pattern after he was again from surgical procedure.

Floor-Stage Statistical Performers
Angels righty Benny Thompson, an undrafted free agent from 2023, had a ridiculous 39% Okay% in 61.1 innings this yr. Granted, he’s an older man who spent the yr in A-ball and he walked a ton of dudes. To my recollection, I’ve by no means seen Thompson, so I don’t know how he’s doing this. His age and wildness make him a lower-priority goal, however a goal nonetheless. Angels outfielder Raudi Rodriguez had an incredible 14 triples in 125 video games and stole 38 bases in 44 makes an attempt. Pirates outfielder Esmerlyn Valdez hit 26 homers this yr, most amongst Fall Leaguers.

TrackMan Performers
Angels righty Najer Victor had a 60% miss charge on his slider this yr, whereas the sliders of Ryan Costeiu, one other Angels reliever, and D-backs rehabber Drey Jameson had slider miss charges simply shy of fifty%. Salt River doesn’t have anybody on the roster with a contact charge over 76%, a mark owned by Jansel Luis. And naturally, I discussed Tony Blanco Jr.

Key Roster State of affairs
Drey Jameson, a former Prime 100 prospect, graduated from rookie standing in 2023, however his profession has been beset by accidents since then. The vacuum created by accidents to Corbin Burnes, A.J. Puk and Justin Martinez, plus the looming potential turnover in Arizona’s rotation as a result of Zac Gallen’s free company, makes it notably vital for Jameson to hit the bottom working and play a key function on the pitching employees of an in any other case aggressive D-backs roster. His look in Arizona will assist decide what sort of function — Starter? Lengthy reliever? Late-inning man? — he would possibly compete for when camp kicks off subsequent spring. Crimson Sox righty Luis Perales is in an analogous state of affairs after coming back from surgical procedure late within the yr. He could be an enormous a part of Boston’s 2026 bullpen.

Distinctive Path
Pirates outfielder Will Taylor comes from a household of adorned athletes in South Carolina and has one of many nuttier highschool athletics résumés you’ll ever see. He lettered 5 instances in baseball, 5 instances in observe & area, 4 instances in soccer and 4 instances in wrestling, he was a three-time state champion in wrestling, and he received state titles in soccer and observe. He went to Clemson as a two-sport athlete and have become the primary soccer and baseball participant on the college since Lions defensive lineman D.J. Reader, however he tore his ACL in 2021 and had only one productive baseball season. He was drafted within the 2024 fifth spherical and had an enormous energy output uptick in 2025.

Scottsdale Scorpions (Tigers, Astros, Mets, Giants, Nationals)

Well-known Gamers
Kevin McGonigle, 2B, Detroit Tigers

You’re little question acquainted with McGonigle, who is among the easiest prospects in baseball because of his elite really feel for contact. An ideal Fall League would tee him as much as exchange Gleyber Torres because the Tigers’ on a regular basis second baseman subsequent yr ought to Torres go away in free company.

Potential Dudes
Jake Bennett, LHP, Washington Nationals
Walker Janek, C, Houston Astros

Bennett is a 6-foot-6, 24-year-old lefty who throws a ton of strikes and has an excellent changeup. He doesn’t throw particularly onerous, however lefties with nice command of nice changeups are likely to outperform their projections. We might see Bennett within the bigs subsequent yr. Janek is an excellent athletic catcher with uncommon pull energy for his place. He strikes out a very good bit, however he’s a small college participant from Sam Houston State who would possibly simply want extra time to regulate to professional pitching.

Floor-Stage Statistical Performers
Sean Paul Liñan, a 20-year-old righty who came visiting from the Dodgers within the Alex Name commerce, isn’t solely one of many youngest couple of pitchers within the league, however he Okay’d 33% of opposing hitters this yr, second most amongst AFL pitchers who threw not less than 70 innings in the course of the season.

TrackMan Performers
Kevin McGonigle checks each field in not less than a mean capability. Astros outfielder Joseph Sullivan had a microscopic 13% chase charge. Sean Paul Liñan’s changeup options 2,600 rpm and generated an elite miss charge this yr. Tigers pitcher Kenny Serwa has a splitter with a triple-digit spin charge.

Key Roster State of affairs
Tigers lefty Jake Miller regarded nice in final yr’s Fall League, however he spent most of 2025 on the IL and solely threw 20 innings. The Tigers’ huge league roster is totally stacked with good pitching, and it’d crowd out Miller to the purpose the place he generates commerce or Rule 5 Draft curiosity this offseason.

Distinctive Path
Giants infielder Parks Harber started his faculty profession at Georgia, then transferred to North Carolina and was ultimately an undrafted senior signal by the Yankees in 2024. He was off to a sizzling begin in 2025, then bought injured a number of weeks earlier than he was traded to the Giants as a part of the Camilo Doval deal. He hit .323 this yr in restricted motion and has the overt physicality of an enormous league 3B/1B, however how actual is the hit device?

Shock Saguaros (Guardians, Royals, Brewers, Phillies, Rangers)

Well-known Gamers
Daniel Espino, RHP, Cleveland Guardians
Blake Mitchell, C, Kansas Metropolis Royals
Sebastian Walcott, SS, Texas Rangers

Espino regarded like the subsequent Gerrit Cole earlier than a number of full-season accidents derailed his profession. He’s been again for a bit, and touched 102 on the backfields earlier than he was briefly despatched to an affiliate in the course of the common season. He appears to be like so much like Ryan Helsley now; let’s see how he and his stuff maintain up (or possibly progress) by the autumn. Mitchell has been well-known since he was a highschool sophomore, a lefty-hitting catcher prospect with huge energy and arm energy. Poor plate self-discipline threatens to show him right into a lefty-hitting Jorge Alfaro, helpful however flawed. Walcott has possibly the most effective long-term energy projection within the minors. He’s a strapping 6-foot-4 and has carried out as a young-for-the-level participant with every project.

Potential Dudes
Josh Adamczewski, 2B/LF, Milwaukee Brewers
Dylan Dreiling, OF, Texas Rangers

Adamczewski has plus lefty bat pace however actually struggles on protection. It’s believable he’ll hit sufficient to be a very good left fielder, a place the place he noticed elevated reps throughout Tutorial League and sure will once more within the AFL. The Rangers have completely overhauled Dreiling’s swing. His angle of assault has modified — his bat is pointed extra vertically when his fingers load — and he’s been given a much bigger leg kick. He made a plus charge of contact in 2025, and this fall might be used to find out how nicely he can time fastballs.

Floor-Stage Statistical Performers
Phillies prospect Dante Nori (52) and Royals prospect Carson Roccaforte (43) had been close to the highest of the stolen base leaderboard throughout the entire minors. Brewers 1B/3B Luke Adams has a profession .423 OBP in 4 seasons. Royals right-hander A.J. Causey had a 0.88 WHIP and 1.72 ERA this yr.

TrackMan Performers
Guardians outfielder Wuilfredo Antunez doesn’t have huge top-end energy, however he’s averaging a completely wild 23 levels of launch, which could be too excessive for him to be productive. Marco Dinges (who you’ll examine shortly) is pacing this group with a 107 mph EV90. Rangers pitcher Joey Danielson generated an absurd 42% miss charge on his 95-96 mph fastball.

Key Roster State of affairs
The Rangers have three pitchers in Arizona who might conceivably play key roles on subsequent yr’s huge league group. Winston Santos is an athletic, strike-throwing 23-year-old righty with a 94-97 mph fastball. He missed time in 2025 with a stress response in his again. I wrote about Jose Corniell in August. And at last, righty Emiliano Teodo will exceed triple digits together with his fastball, however its form and motion aren’t conducive to lacking bats.

Distinctive Path
Marco Dinges started his faculty profession at Tallahassee Neighborhood Faculty the place, throughout his sophomore yr, he developed Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis, a probably deadly autoimmune illness the place white blood cells are produced in extra and assault wholesome tissues and organs relatively than an precise invader, like a virus. For weeks, Dinges had a fever of 105 or so and was actually combating for his life, out and in of various hospitals earlier than he was correctly recognized and handled by a pediatric rheumatologist and professor on the College of Florida. Satirically, after Dinges recovered and was able to resume his baseball profession, he transferred to Florida State for his junior yr. He’s a very toolsy (bat pace, arm energy) if undersized catcher coming off a yr with an OPS over .900.

Arizona Fall League Hitters’ Contact Knowledge

Participant Pos Age Org AFL ContactRate InZoneMiss Chase 2K Chase
Nacho Alvarez Jr. 3B 22 ATL Glendale 78% 17% 25% 40%
Patrick Clohisy CF 23 ATL Glendale 74% 16% 28% 34%
Jim Jarvis SS 24 ATL Glendale 81% 15% 24% 38%
Sam Antonacci 2B 22 CWS Glendale 86% 11% 17% 34%
Ryan Galanie 1B 25 CWS Glendale 76% 17% 23% 28%
Caden Connor LF 25 CWS Glendale 85% 10% 26% 39%
Braden Montgomery CF 22 CWS Glendale 67% 23% 24% 34%
Josue De Paula LF 20 LAD Glendale 76% 20% 14% 23%
Logan Wagner 3B 21 LAD Glendale 67% 25% 23% 29%
Nico Perez 2B 21 LAD Glendale 76% 17% 28% 35%
Graysen Tarlow C 24 STL Glendale 77% 19% 20% 42%
Travis Honeyman CF 23 STL Glendale 81% 15% 24% 39%
Miguel Ugueto RF 23 STL Glendale 78% 12% 40% 58%
Cutter Coffey 3B 21 TOR Glendale 72% 23% 25% 35%
Edward Duran C 21 TOR Glendale 75% 18% 27% 42%
Josh Kasevich SS 24 TOR Glendale 85% 12% 19% 33%
Joshua Kuroda-Grauer SS 22 ATH Mesa 86% 7% 29% 58%
Ryan Lasko CF 23 ATH Mesa 66% 24% 23% 29%
Tommy White 3B 22 ATH Mesa 80% 14% 34% 50%
Cole Mathis DH 22 CHC Mesa 76% 19% 20% 32%
Ed Howard SS 23 CHC Mesa 54% 31% 33% 39%
Owen Ayers C 24 CHC Mesa 72% 20% 22% 29%
Fenwick Trimble CF 23 MIA Mesa 76% 17% 21% 37%
Starlyn Caba SS 19 MIA Mesa 84% 12% 19% 36%
PJ Morlando LF 20 MIA Mesa 69% 22% 21% 35%
Enmanuel Tejeda 2B 20 NYY Mesa 79% 16% 21% 29%
Manuel Palencia C 23 NYY Mesa 79% 16% 30% 56%
Coby Morales 1B 23 NYY Mesa 71% 23% 27% 42%
Aidan Smith CF 21 TB Mesa 67% 25% 25% 37%
Brailer Guerrero RF 19 TB Mesa 64% 25% 27% 27%
Brayden Taylor 3B 23 TB Mesa 72% 21% 19% 26%
Thomas Sosa RF 20 BAL Peoria 70% 25% 29% 37%
Enrique Bradfield Jr. CF 23 BAL Peoria 79% 16% 17% 25%
Ethan Anderson C 22 BAL Peoria 80% 16% 21% 37%
Alfredo Duno C 19 CIN Peoria 69% 26% 15% 19%
Cam Collier 1B 20 CIN Peoria 71% 21% 23% 33%
Leo Balcazar SS 21 CIN Peoria 79% 14% 28% 39%
Billy Amick 1B 22 MIN Peoria 68% 24% 23% 29%
Hendry Mendez LF 21 MIN Peoria 85% 9% 19% 26%
Brandon Winokur CF 20 MIN Peoria 66% 26% 34% 36%
Ryan Jackson SS 23 SD Peoria 77% 16% 21% 37%
Braedon Karpathios RF 22 SD Peoria 71% 25% 19% 24%
Lamar King Jr. C 21 SD Peoria 74% 16% 27% 33%
Charlie Pagliarini 2B 24 SEA Peoria 67% 25% 23% 31%
Jonny Farmelo CF 21 SEA Peoria 65% 26% 21% 33%
Brock Rodden SS 25 SEA Peoria 69% 20% 28% 50%
Jansel Luis 2B 20 AZ Salt River 76% 15% 34% 47%
Kenny Castillo C 21 AZ Salt River 75% 18% 36% 41%
Jack Hurley CF 23 AZ Salt River 58% 35% 33% 42%
Johanfran Garcia C 20 BOS Salt River 65% 26% 33% 40%
Nelly Taylor CF 22 BOS Salt River 67% 25% 18% 33%
Charlie Condon 1B 22 COL Salt River 69% 21% 23% 27%
Jared Thomas LF 22 COL Salt River 69% 22% 25% 40%
Braylen Wimmer LF 24 COL Salt River 73% 18% 32% 42%
Raudi Rodriguez RF 22 LAA Salt River 68% 24% 27% 34%
David Mershon SS 22 LAA Salt River 70% 23% 20% 24%
Juan Flores C 19 LAA Salt River 66% 21% 38% 43%
Esmerlyn Valdez RF 21 PIT Salt River 70% 24% 21% 30%
Tony Blanco Jr. DH 20 PIT Salt River 56% 34% 33% 44%
Will Taylor CF 22 PIT Salt River 66% 26% 20% 26%
Kevin McGonigle SS 21 DET Scottsdale 81% 14% 20% 34%
Max Anderson 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 76% 18% 31% 42%
Jack Penney 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 76% 16% 17% 27%
Joseph Sullivan CF 23 HOU Scottsdale 72% 20% 13% 22%
Walker Janek C 23 HOU Scottsdale 68% 23% 31% 42%
Jeron Williams SS 24 HOU Scottsdale 80% 11% 32% 35%
Chris Suero C 21 NYM Scottsdale 68% 25% 24% 31%
D’Andre Smith RF 24 NYM Scottsdale 77% 15% 33% 48%
Nick Morabito CF 22 NYM Scottsdale 77% 18% 24% 33%
Axiel Plaz C 20 PIT Scottsdale 72% 19% 36% 49%
Parks Harber 3B 23 SF Scottsdale 72% 17% 23% 34%
Walker Martin 3B 21 SF Scottsdale 64% 26% 22% 33%
Maui Ahuna SS 23 SF Scottsdale 66% 23% 24% 34%
Sam Petersen CF 22 WSH Scottsdale 69% 27% 25% 25%
Ethan Petry LF 21 WSH Scottsdale 64% 30% 23% 33%
Seaver King SS 22 WSH Scottsdale 77% 17% 37% 54%
Wuilfredo Antunez RF 23 CLE Shock 74% 20% 31% 44%
Juan Benjamin 3B 22 CLE Shock 77% 14% 27% 42%
Joe Lampe LF 24 CLE Shock 76% 18% 24% 33%
Carson Roccaforte CF 23 KC Shock 67% 25% 19% 30%
Blake Mitchell C 21 KC Shock 64% 31% 18% 25%
Daniel Vazquez SS 21 KC Shock 72% 17% 28% 35%
Luke Adams 1B 21 MIL Shock 77% 17% 15% 28%
Marco Dinges C 22 MIL Shock 71% 21% 24% 36%
Josh Adamczewski 2B 20 MIL Shock 73% 19% 22% 30%
Aidan Miller SS 21 PHI Shock 76% 17% 17% 27%
Dante Nori CF 20 PHI Shock 80% 13% 24% 29%
Carson DeMartini 3B 22 PHI Shock 67% 24% 23% 32%
Sebastian Walcott SS 19 TEX Shock 72% 19% 25% 36%
Malcolm Moore C 22 TEX Shock 74% 16% 26% 38%
Ben Hartl C 22 TEX Shock 74% 20% 21% 29%
Dylan Dreiling CF 22 TEX Shock 83% 12% 24% 40%

Arizona Fall League Hitters’ Energy Knowledge

Participant Pos Age Org AFL EV90 MaxEV HardHit AvgLaunch
Nacho Alvarez Jr. 3B 22 ATL Glendale 101.3 108.2 27% 17
Patrick Clohisy CF 23 ATL Glendale 102.2 111.0 30% 11
Jim Jarvis SS 24 ATL Glendale 104.7 110.0 40% 9
Sam Antonacci 2B 22 CWS Glendale 102.7 109.8 39% 11
Ryan Galanie 1B 25 CWS Glendale 102.6 113.4 42% 14
Caden Connor LF 25 CWS Glendale 102.4 109.1 37% 6
Braden Montgomery CF 22 CWS Glendale 106.8 111.4 47% 7
Josue De Paula LF 20 LAD Glendale 105.3 111.9 42% 12
Logan Wagner 3B 21 LAD Glendale 104.2 110.3 41% 17
Nico Perez 2B 21 LAD Glendale 103.1 108.8 33% 18
Graysen Tarlow C 24 STL Glendale 99.0 103.2 31% 9
Travis Honeyman CF 23 STL Glendale 100.9 108.6 27% 9
Miguel Ugueto RF 23 STL Glendale 103.6 108.8 36% 2
Cutter Coffey 3B 21 TOR Glendale 102.1 113.7 38% 13
Edward Duran C 21 TOR Glendale 101.7 109.1 37% 7
Josh Kasevich SS 24 TOR Glendale 100.2 109.5 40% 16
Joshua Kuroda-Grauer SS 22 ATH Mesa 100.3 113.3 28% 6
Ryan Lasko CF 23 ATH Mesa 102.9 111.1 38% 10
Tommy White 3B 22 ATH Mesa 103.3 114.1 35% 9
Cole Mathis DH 22 CHC Mesa 102.7 108.7 33% 21
Ed Howard SS 23 CHC Mesa 103.6 105.0 41% 9
Owen Ayers C 24 CHC Mesa 104.5 113.3 44% 15
Fenwick Trimble CF 23 MIA Mesa 104.3 109.6 41% 8
Starlyn Caba SS 19 MIA Mesa 98.4 104.8 30% 9
PJ Morlando LF 20 MIA Mesa 102.2 109.0 28% 8
Enmanuel Tejeda 2B 20 NYY Mesa 100.6 110.0 37% 10
Manuel Palencia C 23 NYY Mesa 102.0 111.0 37% 9
Coby Morales 1B 23 NYY Mesa 103.8 111.2 45% 11
Aidan Smith CF 21 TB Mesa 104.1 111.7 39% 16
Brailer Guerrero RF 19 TB Mesa 108.8 115.9 50% 2
Brayden Taylor 3B 23 TB Mesa 101.7 112.8 39% 25
Thomas Sosa RF 20 BAL Peoria 106.7 111.8 41% 14
Enrique Bradfield Jr. CF 23 BAL Peoria 101.2 108.0 32% 14
Ethan Anderson C 22 BAL Peoria 102.9 109.1 38% 13
Alfredo Duno C 19 CIN Peoria 105.5 123.9 48% 14
Cam Collier 1B 20 CIN Peoria 105.6 115.2 48% 8
Leo Balcazar SS 21 CIN Peoria 102.5 113.6 37% 11
Billy Amick 1B 22 MIN Peoria 103.9 111.6 41% 14
Hendry Mendez LF 21 MIN Peoria 104.8 113.0 42% 3
Brandon Winokur CF 20 MIN Peoria 106.0 113.5 41% 10
Ryan Jackson SS 23 SD Peoria 100.8 110.3 32% 10
Braedon Karpathios RF 22 SD Peoria 105.6 111.3 52% 9
Lamar King Jr. C 21 SD Peoria 103.0 109.9 41% 13
Charlie Pagliarini 2B 24 SEA Peoria 108.1 125.9 43% 14
Jonny Farmelo CF 21 SEA Peoria 103.6 108.6 28% 15
Brock Rodden SS 25 SEA Peoria 104.5 110.6 41% 19
Jansel Luis 2B 20 AZ Salt River 101.1 111.5 27% 8
Kenny Castillo C 21 AZ Salt River 103.3 109.0 35% 16
Jack Hurley CF 23 AZ Salt River 105.0 111.4 42% 9
Johanfran Garcia C 20 BOS Salt River 104.3 109.4 41% 20
Nelly Taylor CF 22 BOS Salt River 105.4 111.9 48% 18
Charlie Condon 1B 22 COL Salt River 105.7 112.1 44% 14
Jared Thomas LF 22 COL Salt River 104.6 109.9 48% 14
Braylen Wimmer LF 24 COL Salt River 103.8 128.9 38% 9
Raudi Rodriguez RF 22 LAA Salt River 106.6 111.8 45% 9
David Mershon SS 22 LAA Salt River 99.1 109.0 28% 7
Juan Flores C 19 LAA Salt River 102.9 112.9 34% 19
Esmerlyn Valdez RF 21 PIT Salt River 107.8 115.2 45% 16
Tony Blanco Jr. DH 20 PIT Salt River 113.5 119.8 54% 10
Will Taylor CF 22 PIT Salt River 103.5 108.2 40% 18
Kevin McGonigle SS 21 DET Scottsdale 105.3 113.3 47% 19
Max Anderson 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 104.7 111.3 47% 10
Jack Penney 2B 23 DET Scottsdale 104.5 110.2 45% 8
Joseph Sullivan CF 23 HOU Scottsdale 106.9 111.6 50% 10
Walker Janek C 23 HOU Scottsdale 104.4 111.6 36% 17
Jeron Williams SS 24 HOU Scottsdale 101.1 109.5 33% 7
Chris Suero C 21 NYM Scottsdale 105.4 112.7 42% 14
D’Andre Smith RF 24 NYM Scottsdale 103.5 110.6 40% 10
Nick Morabito CF 22 NYM Scottsdale 103.2 110.2 38% 4
Axiel Plaz C 20 PIT Scottsdale 108.0 113.9 53% 8
Parks Harber 3B 23 SF Scottsdale 107.7 112.4 56% 11
Walker Martin 3B 21 SF Scottsdale 106.7 114.2 48% 13
Maui Ahuna SS 23 SF Scottsdale 105.2 113.7 49% 4
Sam Petersen CF 22 WSH Scottsdale 103.3 110.1 44% 13
Ethan Petry LF 21 WSH Scottsdale 107.1 111.0 47% 2
Seaver King SS 22 WSH Scottsdale 104.8 110.9 40% 6
Wuilfredo Antunez RF 23 CLE Shock 102.0 113.8 33% 23
Juan Benjamin 3B 22 CLE Shock 100.6 110.1 29% 10
Joe Lampe LF 24 CLE Shock 103.3 109.6 36% 10
Carson Roccaforte CF 23 KC Shock 103.6 110.1 43% 18
Blake Mitchell C 21 KC Shock 104.3 109.1 41% 16
Daniel Vazquez SS 21 KC Shock 101.7 111.1 31% 9
Luke Adams 1B 21 MIL Shock 104.2 109.9 34% 17
Marco Dinges C 22 MIL Shock 107.2 111.5 48% 13
Josh Adamczewski 2B 20 MIL Shock 103.9 110.5 39% 14
Aidan Miller SS 21 PHI Shock 106.3 114.5 43% 14
Dante Nori CF 20 PHI Shock 101.0 109.2 32% 11
Carson DeMartini 3B 22 PHI Shock 104.2 111.4 42% 21
Sebastian Walcott SS 19 TEX Shock 106.8 113.3 40% 8
Malcolm Moore C 22 TEX Shock 101.2 110.7 27% 19
Ben Hartl C 22 TEX Shock 100.4 105.9 31% 12
Dylan Dreiling CF 22 TEX Shock 103.9 111.2 40% 16

Arizona Fall League Pitchers’ Motion Knowledge

Pitcher Org Arm FV Pitch Avg IVB Horiz Miss Chase
Cory Wall ATL R Glendale 4SM 92.6 18.8 8.5 24% 25%
Cory Wall ATL R Glendale SL 83.7 1.6 -1.4 32% 36%
Cory Wall ATL R Glendale CH 81.0 3.4 12.8 41% 31%
LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale 4SM 95.0 15.8 8.1 27% 17%
LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale 2SM 95.0 14.0 11.9 39% 29%
LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale CT 88.4 2.9 -4.3 31% 32%
LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale SL 87.5 1.1 -4.8 43% 42%
Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale 4SM 93.4 18.0 8.6 30% 22%
Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale CT 88.4 5.3 0.1 35% 30%
Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale SL 84.1 5.3 1.3 36% 32%
Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale 2SM 93.5 13.6 13.6 32% 24%
Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale CT 86.4 6.3 0.2 31% 13%
Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale SL 84.7 5.0 0.6 27% 29%
Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale CH 84.8 5.4 8.6 33% 36%
Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale 4SM 95.6 20.1 5.0 32% 26%
Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale CT 88.4 6.7 -2.5 52% 29%
Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale SL 87.4 4.6 -3.4 55% 23%
Connor McCullough CWS R Glendale 2SM 90.9 9.1 14.4 25% 27%
Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale 4SM 93.9 16.0 -10.6 43% 16%
Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale 2SM 93.8 15.2 -12.0 27% 18%
Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale SL 81.7 -2.2 4.9 48% 28%
Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale 4SM 92.9 18.5 10.0 22% 35%
Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale 2SM 93.1 16.6 14.5 26% 35%
Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale CB/SLV 78.9 -5.5 -8.7 42% 40%
Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale CH 83.7 8.0 13.4 41% 17%
Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale 4SM 94.9 18.9 9.0 29% 24%
Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale SL 84.1 -0.6 -8.1 23% 25%
Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale CH 84.2 4.8 14.3 46% 22%
Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale 4SM 97.0 19.1 8.4 45% 17%
Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale CT 90.4 5.3 -4.1 39% 21%
Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale SL 87.6 -5.8 -6.6 63% 38%
Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale CB/SLV 84.6 -14.6 -11.1 48% 30%
Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale 4SM 94.1 18.0 5.2 21% 18%
Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale 2SM 89.9 10.7 17.5 57% 25%
Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale SL 87.9 2.0 -3.4 46% 28%
Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale CB/SLV 78.2 -22.1 -5.2 86% 14%
Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale 4SM 94.7 14.2 -7.7 25% 28%
Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale 2SM 92.8 6.1 -14.5 12% 18%
Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale SWP 85.4 -1.2 14.2 53% 42%
Justin Chambers LAD L Glendale 2SM 92.7 5.9 -15.8 34% 30%
Justin Chambers LAD L Glendale SWP 79.0 -5.7 14.7 79% 42%
Payton Martin LAD R Glendale 4SM 94.1 17.5 5.9 16% 18%
Payton Martin LAD R Glendale CT 88.2 6.2 -2.9 36% 33%
Payton Martin LAD R Glendale SL 84.3 2.1 -7.0 40% 48%
Payton Martin LAD R Glendale CB/SLV 80.1 -5.9 -10.7 42% 34%
Payton Martin LAD R Glendale CH 86.7 6.6 12.1 43% 20%
D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale 4SM 94.9 18.3 4.9 12% 14%
D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale CT 87.0 2.8 -8.7 52% 68%
D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale SL 86.2 1.0 -8.8 34% 25%
Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale 4SM 92.6 15.4 8.5 17% 15%
Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale 2SM 92.3 12.1 13.5 9% 32%
Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale SL 81.9 0.5 0.2 41% 32%
Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale CB/SLV 79.8 -7.0 -1.6 37% 33%
Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale CH 85.6 4.5 14.6 36% 22%
Randel Clemente STL R Glendale 4SM 96.0 17.9 11.2 21% 26%
Randel Clemente STL R Glendale 2SM 96.2 16.1 14.1 22% 17%
Randel Clemente STL R Glendale CT 87.6 1.0 0.0 54% 32%
Randel Clemente STL R Glendale SL 86.6 -0.4 -0.5 70% 46%
Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale 4SM 95.4 17.3 11.2 30% 18%
Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale 2SM 94.1 13.2 13.9 25% 14%
Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale SL 85.4 -2.9 -7.8 42% 33%
Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale CB/SLV 84.4 -7.6 -8.8 30% 21%
Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale 4SM 93.7 19.6 8.1 33% 25%
Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale CT 86.7 6.0 -2.6 31% 28%
Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale SL 85.5 3.8 -3.6 46% 23%
Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale CB/SLV 77.3 -13.3 -9.9 24% 8%
Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale 4SM 96.5 18.8 6.0 32% 28%
Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale CT 91.1 5.6 -1.7 55% 39%
Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale SL 89.7 2.2 -2.4 39% 33%
Kai Peterson TOR L Glendale 2SM 92.0 12.0 -17.8 28% 29%
Kai Peterson TOR L Glendale SL 83.4 1.8 0.7 26% 22%
Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale 4SM 95.9 14.7 6.7 33% 18%
Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale 2SM 93.9 8.4 15.6 27% 29%
Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale SL 86.9 4.4 -5.4 26% 32%
Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa 4SM 93.0 17.9 7.7 13% 22%
Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa 2SM 92.0 13.3 15.1 26% 6%
Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa SL 85.9 1.1 -2.2 35% 38%
Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa CH 84.6 4.3 11.9 15% 27%
Corey Avant ATH R Mesa 4SM 94.7 18.7 10.0 21% 27%
Corey Avant ATH R Mesa 2SM 91.8 10.2 13.6 20% 29%
Corey Avant ATH R Mesa SL 85.3 -3.5 -3.5 39% 30%
Corey Avant ATH R Mesa CB/SLV 79.6 -13.3 -9.6 40% 19%
Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa 4SM 94.7 15.2 7.3 19% 26%
Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa CT 89.5 8.6 -2.4 34% 15%
Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa SL 83.5 4.8 -10.4 34% 30%
Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa 2SM 91.8 9.2 16.4 13% 21%
Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa SL 83.0 1.9 -11.9 26% 33%
Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa CB/SLV 80.6 -2.2 -15.4 35% 24%
Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa CH 84.7 6.5 15.7 31% 21%
Will Johnston ATH L Mesa 4SM 91.3 16.4 -6.6 11% 13%
Will Johnston ATH L Mesa SL 81.9 0.0 -3.0 58% 33%
Will Johnston ATH L Mesa CB/SLV 81.9 -3.6 -1.3 56% 44%
Will Johnston ATH L Mesa CH 81.4 5.3 -8.9 47% 33%
JP Wheat CHC R Mesa 4SM 97.5 16.0 8.8 37% 17%
JP Wheat CHC R Mesa 2SM 97.4 13.4 14.2 28% 21%
JP Wheat CHC R Mesa CT 89.0 6.1 -3.4 51% 23%
Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa 4SM 94.9 16.2 11.5 44% 30%
Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa 2SM 93.8 10.9 15.6 26% 23%
Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa SL 81.9 2.3 -9.3 44% 27%
Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa 4SM 95.2 14.7 8.3 26% 20%
Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa 2SM 95.1 13.5 12.2 19% 24%
Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa CT 88.2 6.8 -1.4 27% 23%
Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa SL 85.9 3.6 -3.7 39% 39%
Thomas Mangus CHC R Mesa 4SM 94.9 17.5 6.3 15% 28%
Holt Jones MIA R Mesa 4SM 95.9 14.3 9.6 27% 21%
Holt Jones MIA R Mesa 2SM 95.9 13.0 12.4 23% 26%
Holt Jones MIA R Mesa CT 87.9 4.1 -1.4 48% 25%
Holt Jones MIA R Mesa SL 84.2 4.7 -9.6 39% 33%
Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa 4SM 92.5 12.4 -6.2 17% 22%
Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa 2SM 92.7 10.2 -13.3 15% 14%
Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa SWP 83.4 -2.7 14.7 35% 21%
Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa CH 85.6 5.6 -8.1 41% 52%
Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa 4SM 95.0 17.3 8.4 33% 23%
Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa 2SM 94.4 14.0 13.1 28% 19%
Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa CT 88.2 3.8 -1.3 36% 40%
Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa SL 85.3 0.5 -6.0 30% 38%
Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa CB/SLV 82.1 -9.3 -6.9 38% 24%
Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa 4SM 93.1 14.1 3.3 19% 25%
Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa CT 92.0 12.4 -1.0 23% 17%
Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa SWP 83.1 -0.8 -17.2 48% 32%
Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa CB/SLV 81.6 -7.7 -15.3 27% 23%
Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa 4SM 94.1 17.5 4.7 26% 24%
Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa 2SM 88.9 13.4 17.6 33% 33%
Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa SL 83.1 -0.9 -5.4 36% 32%
Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa CB/SLV 79.7 -8.1 -6.1 36% 22%
Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa 4SM 93.5 15.1 8.4 22% 21%
Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa 2SM 93.5 14.0 12.7 25% 25%
Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa CT 90.1 7.9 -2.4 24% 25%
Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa SL 85.3 5.7 -5.9 56% 50%
Andrew Lindsey TB R Mesa 2SM 95.0 5.8 15.3 13% 8%
Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa 4SM 94.3 17.5 8.6 30% 31%
Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa 2SM 94.1 15.9 13.5 20% 30%
Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa CT 88.6 7.3 -1.5 21% 22%
Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa CB/SLV 79.3 -11.7 -8.6 39% 26%
Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa CH 86.8 4.3 14.8 39% 29%
Jadon Bercovich TB R Mesa 4SM 94.2 18.7 8.3 28% 20%
Jadon Bercovich TB R Mesa SL 83.7 1.3 -7.3 88% 38%
Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa 4SM 94.7 16.5 7.3 41% 33%
Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa 2SM 95.0 15.1 13.1 20% 21%
Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa CT 88.0 4.6 -3.6 18% 21%
Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa SL 85.3 0.0 -5.3 0% 7%
Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria 4SM 92.5 18.3 -5.5 31% 26%
Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria SL 81.9 -0.9 6.1 44% 43%
Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria CH 82.2 5.9 -11.6 50% 31%
Luis De León BAL L Peoria 4SM 96.1 13.7 -12.3 7% 5%
Luis De León BAL L Peoria 2SM 95.4 11.9 -14.5 15% 22%
Luis De León BAL L Peoria SL 84.9 1.2 4.3 45% 35%
Luis De León BAL L Peoria CH 87.3 5.9 -15.2 42% 29%
Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria 2SM 89.4 9.5 -16.8 25% 36%
Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria SL 82.9 0.4 7.0 35% 34%
Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria CH 87.4 7.4 -15.1 16% 34%
Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria 4SM 94.4 16.0 5.5 15% 12%
Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria CT 88.0 4.2 -2.6 35% 12%
Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria SL 84.1 -0.8 -7.6 41% 28%
Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria CB/SLV 82.2 -5.3 -11.1 32% 24%
Rhett Lowder CIN R Peoria 2SM 93.0 6.4 16.7 9% 23%
Rhett Lowder CIN R Peoria SL 85.5 -1.9 -3.6 50% 43%
Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria 4SM 94.8 14.6 3.6 16% 19%
Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria CT 88.0 0.6 -7.9 24% 25%
Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria SL 84.9 -1.9 -10.0 36% 39%
Trevor Kuncl CIN R Peoria CH 86.4 7.3 9.5 50% 58%
Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria 4SM 92.7 17.1 7.7 17% 18%
Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria CT 86.2 7.4 -3.0 33% 37%
Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria SL 84.1 3.6 -4.4 32% 11%
Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria CB/SLV 77.2 -7.9 -3.3 27% 16%
Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria SPL 83.3 2.4 8.4 50% 27%
Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria 4SM 93.6 19.1 8.0 29% 26%
Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria SL 84.0 2.3 -1.5 36% 25%
Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria CH 80.1 4.7 12.4 63% 36%
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria 4SM 91.5 16.6 10.5 3% 17%
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria 2SM 91.4 15.0 13.3 15% 22%
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria CT 85.9 8.4 -1.4 31% 29%
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria SL 84.4 5.1 -1.6 30% 39%
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria CB/SLV 77.4 -10.4 -10.5 37% 17%
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria CH 82.5 3.6 10.6 30% 31%
Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria 2SM 85.9 12.2 -18.1 21% 23%
Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria CT 77.5 8.2 -0.6 15% 19%
Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria SL 70.7 1.3 8.2 27% 33%
Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria CH 76.5 4.3 -9.2 18% 31%
Johan Moreno SD R Peoria 4SM 92.7 17.5 5.8 20% 14%
Johan Moreno SD R Peoria SL 83.2 0.6 -3.8 52% 30%
Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria 4SM 93.8 12.3 4.6 13% 19%
Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria CT 92.1 9.6 -1.0 23% 27%
Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria SL 84.2 0.2 -3.6 34% 24%
Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria CH 86.8 6.2 15.5 29% 25%
Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria 4SM 92.8 16.3 6.2 26% 18%
Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria 2SM 90.0 9.6 14.3 17% 10%
Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria CT 86.8 3.2 -0.8 52% 37%
Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria SL 85.7 0.7 -2.5 40% 35%
Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria CH 87.5 7.9 12.3 24% 24%
Tanner Smith SD R Peoria 4SM 94.0 14.8 7.6 17% 15%
Tanner Smith SD R Peoria 2SM 93.2 7.6 12.8 30% 29%
Tanner Smith SD R Peoria CB/SLV 84.1 -12.1 -7.9 40% 36%
Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria 4SM 95.7 17.6 9.0 48% 26%
Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria SL 84.9 0.8 -8.8 35% 40%
Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria CB/SLV 81.4 -8.2 -5.7 70% 50%
Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria 4SM 90.5 12.1 6.9 29% 22%
Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria 2SM 90.3 6.0 15.9 15% 16%
Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria SL 81.9 2.4 -10.4 13% 27%
Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria CB/SLV 77.4 -0.6 -17.4 23% 21%
Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria CH 84.0 1.1 14.9 22% 31%
Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria 4SM 92.4 15.7 5.9 12% 22%
Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria CT 87.9 4.0 -4.5 37% 32%
Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria SL 84.1 0.6 -11.0 29% 35%
Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria 2SM 92.0 7.3 20.2 12% 25%
Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria SL 83.2 0.7 -5.0 28% 36%
Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria CB/SLV 81.3 -4.8 -5.7 29% 24%
Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria CH 83.4 0.6 18.8 26% 32%
Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria 4SM 92.7 18.1 10.9 22% 28%
Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria 2SM 91.4 12.6 16.2 15% 35%
Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria CT 88.1 8.4 -1.4 42% 39%
Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria SL 82.7 6.2 -12.8 40% 33%
Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria CH 87.4 4.1 9.5 28% 52%
Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria 2SM 87.4 3.6 19.8 38% 39%
Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria SL 76.0 8.9 -11.3 27% 30%
Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria CB/SLV 72.9 7.4 -14.8 41% 28%
Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria CH 84.8 4.3 19.8 24% 30%
Drey Jameson AZ R Salt 4SM 98.0 13.4 8.4 11% 12%
Drey Jameson AZ R Salt 2SM 94.8 4.9 15.4 19% 32%
Drey Jameson AZ R Salt SL 87.1 1.2 -2.2 48% 36%
Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt 4SM 91.7 16.2 -0.7 35% 20%
Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt SL 86.1 1.5 -4.4 33% 28%
Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt CB/SLV 79.8 -10.0 0.7 45% 31%
Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt 4SM 95.4 14.8 10.3 25% 23%
Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt 2SM 94.9 10.9 14.1 18% 24%
Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt SL 84.4 2.2 -4.4 29% 24%
Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt CH 87.8 4.8 11.2 16% 20%
Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt 2SM 92.6 11.9 13.8 36% 15%
Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt SL 82.1 2.6 -4.4 26% 24%
Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt CB/SLV 79.1 1.1 -10.1 25% 28%
Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt CH 85.1 -0.7 15.2 5% 17%
Jay Allmer BOS R Salt 2SM 91.4 6.2 15.2 10% 15%
Jay Allmer BOS R Salt SL 81.7 5.7 -7.1 20% 21%
Jay Allmer BOS R Salt CH 84.7 4.5 15.6 25% 27%
Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt 2SM 93.0 13.9 -15.2 14% 31%
Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt SL 84.6 2.1 5.3 34% 39%
Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt CH 85.9 0.7 -14.2 42% 57%
Austin Smith COL R Salt 4SM 96.6 16.5 7.8 32% 19%
Austin Smith COL R Salt SL 84.6 -0.4 -6.0 35% 31%
Ben Shields COL L Salt 2SM 92.9 15.5 -13.4 31% 22%
Ben Shields COL L Salt SL 81.2 -1.3 10.1 37% 25%
Ben Shields COL L Salt CB/SLV 80.8 -11.2 10.9 50% 46%
Cade Denton COL R Salt 4SM 93.9 14.1 12.9 33% 9%
Cade Denton COL R Salt 2SM 93.8 10.8 16.1 20% 22%
Cade Denton COL R Salt SL 82.5 -2.0 -4.5 32% 20%
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt 4SM 94.8 15.1 8.6 18% 26%
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt 2SM 95.1 11.2 15.2 12% 27%
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt CT 86.9 4.5 -3.5 27% 28%
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt SL 85.3 0.0 -4.9 47% 30%
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt CB/SLV 82.2 -9.0 -7.4 31% 15%
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt CH 87.8 9.2 11.6 32% 14%
Welinton Herrera COL L Salt 4SM 96.5 17.7 -12.2 36% 29%
Welinton Herrera COL L Salt 2SM 95.7 17.6 -12.8 39% 28%
Welinton Herrera COL L Salt SL 85.7 0.7 0.5 57% 34%
Benny Thompson LAA R Salt 4SM 94.3 19.7 8.4 32% 23%
Benny Thompson LAA R Salt SL 84.7 3.3 -4.0 28% 18%
Benny Thompson LAA R Salt CH 80.9 8.6 16.2 56% 29%
Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt 4SM 95.7 15.1 12.2 15% 13%
Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt 2SM 93.6 10.4 16.7 20% 19%
Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt SL 89.2 6.1 0.2 36% 28%
Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt 4SM 97.0 15.9 12.1 31% 19%
Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt 2SM 96.2 11.4 17.1 18% 19%
Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt SWP 81.6 -2.9 -14.1 77% 20%
Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt CB/SLV 80.3 -9.2 -16.5 63% 27%
Najer Victor LAA R Salt 4SM 96.5 17.2 12.8 34% 22%
Najer Victor LAA R Salt 2SM 95.9 13.3 16.7 17% 23%
Najer Victor LAA R Salt SL 84.1 3.8 -4.9 61% 32%
Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt 4SM 92.7 20.2 10.1 20% 23%
Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt CT 88.0 5.6 -2.8 47% 27%
Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt SL 86.7 4.1 -2.5 22% 23%
Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt CB/SLV 79.7 -14.8 -7.1 32% 27%
Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt CH 82.7 10.7 16.5 38% 34%
Carlson Reed PIT R Salt 4SM 91.8 14.3 5.5 20% 16%
Carlson Reed PIT R Salt 2SM 89.6 9.2 13.9 28% 25%
Carlson Reed PIT R Salt SL 82.9 3.2 -9.6 35% 23%
Carlson Reed PIT R Salt CH 84.0 9.3 11.7 38% 32%
Derek Diamond PIT R Salt 4SM 93.5 17.0 8.9 17% 19%
Derek Diamond PIT R Salt 2SM 94.0 15.4 13.1 28% 20%
Dominic Perachi PIT L Salt 4SM 90.7 16.5 -4.5 41% 24%
Jaden Woods PIT L Salt 2SM 92.3 17.0 -13.7 20% 26%
Jaden Woods PIT L Salt SL 82.8 2.5 0.1 28% 21%
Joshua Loeschorn PIT R Salt 2SM 89.6 14.1 17.0 8% 31%
Joshua Loeschorn PIT R Salt SL 82.2 7.5 -4.4 28% 28%
David Hagaman TEX R Salt 4SM 94.1 17.5 10.5 23% 33%
Juan Sanchez SF R Scotts 4SM 93.8 13.2 8.4 15% 19%
Juan Sanchez SF R Scotts 2SM 94.2 12.6 12.8 9% 13%
Juan Sanchez SF R Scotts SL 84.0 -0.7 -3.8 59% 33%
Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts 4SM 91.2 17.1 9.4 22% 24%
Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts 2SM 91.2 14.2 14.0 14% 33%
Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts SL 83.1 4.6 -4.4 21% 25%
Carlos Lequerica DET R Scotts CH 83.5 8.6 16.2 38% 30%
Dariel Fregio DET R Scotts 4SM 93.1 15.6 14.1 29% 14%
Dariel Fregio DET R Scotts 2SM 92.7 13.9 15.6 19% 20%
Dariel Fregio DET R Scotts CH 86.4 0.0 12.1 27% 38%
Jake Miller DET L Scotts 4SM 92.4 18.0 -6.5 22% 23%
Jake Miller DET L Scotts 2SM 92.1 17.4 -10.7 32% 10%
Jake Miller DET L Scotts SL 82.5 2.1 7.2 39% 40%
Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts 4SM 90.7 14.6 8.7 15% 21%
Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts 2SM 90.5 10.8 12.5 15% 20%
Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts CT 86.2 4.9 0.7 23% 40%
Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts SL 82.1 3.8 -1.3 26% 23%
Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts CB/SLV 79.2 -2.6 -0.9 26% 16%
Kenny Serwa DET R Scotts CH 82.3 4.5 9.3 32% 9%
Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts 4SM 96.1 17.1 4.3 30% 26%
Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts CT 90.1 5.9 -1.8 25% 18%
Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts SL 84.6 -1.7 -10.1 33% 21%
Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 83.6 -11.7 -8.2 37% 20%
Anderson Brito HOU R Scotts CH 86.5 4.7 10.4 38% 26%
Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts 4SM 91.6 18.0 9.8 21% 28%
Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts 2SM 91.9 16.7 13.6 13% 32%
Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts CT 87.6 8.8 0.0 31% 29%
Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts SL 83.5 2.2 -1.2 35% 24%
Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 78.9 -10.6 -6.3 36% 21%
Brett Gillis HOU R Scotts CH 85.0 6.9 9.2 28% 25%
Derek True HOU R Scotts 4SM 93.3 17.0 8.4 19% 24%
Derek True HOU R Scotts 2SM 92.5 13.4 13.0 17% 38%
Derek True HOU R Scotts CT 89.0 7.9 -0.6 14% 13%
Derek True HOU R Scotts SL 82.9 2.1 -10.2 28% 13%
Derek True HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 79.7 -8.3 -6.7 29% 27%
Derek True HOU R Scotts CH 86.6 6.2 11.6 36% 30%
Hudson Leach HOU R Scotts 4SM 95.7 17.4 8.5 31% 21%
Hudson Leach HOU R Scotts CT 89.8 5.1 -4.3 47% 29%
James Hicks HOU R Scotts 2SM 92.0 9.7 14.1 22% 46%
James Hicks HOU R Scotts CB/SLV 79.9 -8.8 -12.7 32% 24%
James Hicks HOU R Scotts CH 85.6 3.6 16.4 5% 32%
Nate Wohlgemuth HOU R Scotts 2SM 93.6 15.7 16.2 32% 20%
Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts 4SM 92.3 15.6 12.0 28% 18%
Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts 2SM 92.1 13.2 15.1 20% 17%
Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts CT 86.4 7.5 0.2 14% 7%
Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts SL 84.1 6.1 -1.9 25% 21%
Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scotts CH 81.0 0.9 16.4 65% 45%
Austin Troesser NYM R Scotts 4SM 93.8 19.6 5.0 25% 19%
Brett Banks NYM R Scotts 4SM 94.9 16.6 7.2 17% 19%
Brett Banks NYM R Scotts SL 83.5 4.3 -10.3 29% 33%
Jose T. Perez SF R Scotts 4SM 94.5 17.1 6.3 29% 27%
Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts 4SM 91.8 16.4 -5.8 28% 22%
Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts 2SM 91.4 12.4 -11.8 22% 32%
Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts SL 81.3 -1.9 5.5 43% 35%
Ricardo Estrada SF L Scotts CH 86.7 6.5 -13.2 36% 36%
Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts 4SM 92.9 18.0 9.3 25% 31%
Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts 2SM 91.8 11.8 13.0 16% 24%
Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts CT 87.2 6.6 -3.1 42% 36%
Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts SL 84.0 2.4 -5.1 42% 35%
Austin Amaral WSH R Scotts CH 87.4 4.9 10.3 44% 13%
Jake Bennett WSH L Scotts 2SM 92.9 11.4 -14.0 28% 31%
Jake Bennett WSH L Scotts SL 81.8 -0.4 4.5 26% 28%
Jake Bennett WSH L Scotts CH 86.2 8.5 -14.3 39% 35%
Jared Simpson WSH L Scotts 2SM 93.4 15.1 -14.3 29% 21%
Jared Simpson WSH L Scotts SL 82.7 -0.6 1.2 46% 22%
Jared Simpson WSH L Scotts CH 86.0 2.5 -12.0 3% 0%
Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts 4SM 91.1 17.5 -9.3 38% 30%
Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts 2SM 91.2 17.4 -11.9 20% 18%
Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts SL 81.2 4.1 4.7 43% 47%
Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scotts CH 84.6 13.3 -12.3 18% 28%
Matt Jachec CLE R Surp 2SM 93.1 8.7 15.5 3% 32%
Matt Jachec CLE R Surp SL 83.0 1.9 -9.2 46% 36%
Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surp 4SM 92.2 16.1 4.9 28% 27%
Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surp SL 82.8 2.6 -6.9 31% 28%
Rorik Maltrud CLE R Surp CB/SLV 77.5 -7.7 -11.0 41% 13%
Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp 4SM 91.2 18.2 8.2 18% 32%
Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp CT 86.0 7.0 0.0 16% 25%
Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp SL 84.7 5.8 0.5 41% 36%
Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp CB/SLV 78.4 -10.3 -4.8 26% 22%
Trenton Denholm CLE R Surp CH 81.2 8.5 14.9 40% 30%
Zane Morehouse CLE R Surp 4SM 94.7 12.5 3.2 19% 18%
Zane Morehouse CLE R Surp CT 89.2 5.3 -3.0 32% 24%
Zane Morehouse CLE R Surp SL 85.6 0.9 -4.9 50% 35%
A.J. Causey KC R Surp 2SM 90.2 1.2 18.0 17% 25%
A.J. Causey KC R Surp CB/SLV 76.4 0.5 -13.3 42% 29%
A.J. Causey KC R Surp CH 82.0 1.3 19.9 42% 26%
Dennis Colleran KC R Surp 4SM 97.5 13.2 9.5 35% 18%
Dennis Colleran KC R Surp 2SM 97.8 10.0 13.7 26% 21%
Dennis Colleran KC R Surp CT 90.6 6.3 -3.9 43% 33%
Dennis Colleran KC R Surp SL 87.2 4.1 -8.2 31% 19%
Hunter Owen KC L Surp 4SM 92.2 18.3 -6.8 28% 24%
Hunter Owen KC L Surp SL 85.2 4.1 5.3 32% 23%
Hunter Owen KC L Surp CB/SLV 75.4 -13.4 9.2 42% 22%
Hunter Owen KC L Surp CH 84.9 9.7 -11.0 31% 31%
L.P. Langevin KC R Surp 2SM 94.5 11.6 18.5 33% 16%
Logan Martin KC R Surp 4SM 94.3 18.2 9.9 17% 29%
Logan Martin KC R Surp 2SM 94.2 16.1 13.5 21% 22%
Logan Martin KC R Surp CT 87.1 6.3 -2.9 46% 30%
Logan Martin KC R Surp SL 84.4 3.4 -5.8 20% 25%
Logan Martin KC R Surp CH 85.5 8.1 15.1 38% 20%
Anthony Flores MIL L Surp 4SM 88.6 10.6 -3.9 18% 18%
Anthony Flores MIL L Surp SL 83.5 0.1 8.1 29% 30%
Anthony Flores MIL L Surp CH 88.4 9.5 -9.1 14% 10%
Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp 4SM 94.3 13.9 4.8 17% 18%
Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp 2SM 92.8 9.7 13.0 15% 18%
Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp CT 88.8 4.4 -3.6 24% 30%
Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp SL 83.0 2.0 -12.3 34% 35%
Brett Wichrowski MIL R Surp CB/SLV 80.2 -5.2 -12.3 28% 27%
Jesus Broca MIL L Surp 4SM 92.8 14.5 -4.8 20% 18%
Jesus Broca MIL L Surp 2SM 93.5 9.2 -12.0 15% 27%
Jesus Broca MIL L Surp SL 78.9 -1.8 7.6 34% 13%
Jesus Broca MIL L Surp CH 84.4 6.9 -12.3 29% 37%
Nate Peterson MIL L Surp 4SM 90.9 17.6 -3.8 22% 24%
Nate Peterson MIL L Surp SL 82.9 0.7 5.5 27% 32%
Nate Peterson MIL L Surp CB/SLV 77.0 -9.1 6.5 32% 26%
Nate Peterson MIL L Surp CH 84.9 3.2 -10.6 21% 20%
Daniel Harper PHI R Surp 4SM 95.3 17.4 10.2 26% 35%
Daniel Harper PHI R Surp 2SM 94.5 14.9 13.7 21% 31%
Daniel Harper PHI R Surp CT 89.1 6.9 0.4 26% 24%
Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surp 4SM 94.8 16.6 6.4 16% 24%
Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surp 2SM 93.3 11.7 14.4 15% 22%
Eiberson Castellano PHI R Surp CB/SLV 82.6 -11.8 -7.7 28% 21%
Jack Dallas PHI R Surp 4SM 91.6 17.1 6.3 22% 17%
Jack Dallas PHI R Surp CT 86.4 5.9 -4.2 13% 32%
Jack Dallas PHI R Surp SL 82.7 0.7 -12.5 33% 46%
Jack Dallas PHI R Surp CB/SLV 80.3 -3.6 -15.5 24% 28%
Jack Dallas PHI R Surp CH 83.6 0.8 13.8 33% 30%
Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surp 4SM 95.5 19.8 7.1 27% 23%
Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surp CT 86.7 6.3 -4.1 46% 28%
Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Surp SL 83.6 2.8 -3.9 38% 20%
Tommy McCollum PHI R Surp 4SM 93.4 18.7 8.4 33% 39%
Tommy McCollum PHI R Surp CT 88.6 9.2 1.6 29% 28%
Tommy McCollum PHI R Surp CH 86.7 3.0 11.0 45% 38%
Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surp 4SM 98.1 10.1 14.5 16% 19%
Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surp 2SM 96.8 7.6 15.6 21% 11%
Emiliano Teodo TEX R Surp SL 86.1 0.5 -0.9 62% 30%
Joey Danielson TEX R Surp 4SM 95.5 17.4 10.0 42% 28%
Joey Danielson TEX R Surp 2SM 93.6 6.4 17.5 21% 24%
Joey Danielson TEX R Surp CT 89.6 8.9 -0.7 31% 37%
Joey Danielson TEX R Surp SL 83.9 1.8 -9.3 30% 19%
Jose Corniell TEX R Surp 4SM 95.8 15.5 10.5 33% 33%
Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp 4SM 92.8 15.6 8.7 23% 14%
Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp 2SM 92.9 12.0 14.6 21% 18%
Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp CT 86.4 3.9 -4.1 35% 29%
Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp SL 84.8 1.1 -5.5 43% 28%
Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp CB/SLV 78.2 -9.4 -10.3 48% 37%
Kolton Curtis TEX R Surp CH 79.2 1.6 17.4 53% 30%
Winston Santos TEX R Surp 4SM 94.2 17.3 9.3 35% 43%

Arizona Fall League Pitchers’ Launch Knowledge

Pitcher Org Arm AFL Ext RelHt RelSd
Cory Wall ATL R Glendale 6.4 69.7 -22
LJ McDonough ATL R Glendale 7.1 59.9 -18
Luke Sinnard ATL R Glendale 6.5 81.6 -23
Trent Buchanan ATL R Glendale 5.9 61.3 -27
Carson Jacobs CWS R Glendale 6.5 82.6 -13
Connor McCullough CWS R Glendale 5.8 63.5 -25
Hagen Smith CWS L Glendale 6.7 65.0 33
Jarold Rosado CWS R Glendale 6.5 77.3 -22
Tyler Davis CWS R Glendale 6.6 68.2 -16
Alex Makarewich LAD R Glendale 6.2 66.3 -27
Hyun-Seok Jang LAD R Glendale 6.4 71.6 -15
Jakob Wright LAD L Glendale 6.0 63.5 25
Justin Chambers LAD L Glendale 6.1 64.0 17
Payton Martin LAD R Glendale 6.8 69.5 -14
D.J. Carpenter STL R Glendale 6.5 82.5 -13
Darlin Saladin STL R Glendale 5.8 68.3 -15
Randel Clemente STL R Glendale 6.4 70.2 -13
Tyler Bradt STL R Glendale 5.4 68.9 -18
Alex Amalfi TOR R Glendale 6.9 72.0 -29
Chay Yeager TOR R Glendale 6.0 69.3 -18
Kai Peterson TOR L Glendale 5.9 56.6 23
Yondrei Rojas TOR R Glendale 6.4 66.0 -38
Blaze Pontes ATH R Mesa 5.9 71.1 -15
Corey Avant ATH R Mesa 6.2 73.9 -22
Mark Adamiak ATH R Mesa 6.4 73.7 -31
Nathan Dettmer ATH R Mesa 5.9 75.2 -11
Will Johnston ATH L Mesa 6.0 81.1 3
JP Wheat CHC R Mesa 6.3 75.2 -25
Luis Martinez-Gomez CHC R Mesa 6.2 64.3 -33
Mathew Peters CHC R Mesa 5.8 62.4 -13
Thomas Mangus CHC R Mesa 5.8 75.0 -16
Holt Jones MIA R Mesa 7.2 68.9 -26
Jack Sellinger MIA L Mesa 6.0 74.6 20
Karson Milbrandt MIA R Mesa 6.0 69.3 -28
Brady Kirtner NYY R Mesa 5.8 71.5 -16
Bryce Cunningham NYY R Mesa 7.0 71.3 -18
Hueston Morrill NYY R Mesa 6.1 63.2 -19
Andrew Lindsey TB R Mesa 6.2 60.1 -21
Jackson Baumeister TB R Mesa 7.0 67.4 -20
Jadon Bercovich TB R Mesa 6.2 69.1 -19
Jonathan Russell TB R Mesa 6.1 68.7 -21
Carson Dorsey BAL L Peoria 6.8 72.5 18
Luis De León BAL L Peoria 5.9 75.0 19
Sayer Diederich BAL L Peoria 5.6 67.9 18
Luke Hayden CIN R Peoria 6.5 68.9 -18
Rhett Lowder CIN R Peoria 6.1 66.4 -30
Dylan Questad MIN R Peoria 6.6 69.4 -15
Hunter Hoopes MIN R Peoria 7.1 69.9 -16
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria 6.2 68.3 -24
Jakob Corridor MIN R Peoria 6.2 68.8 -21
Zander Sechrist MIN L Peoria 6.0 60.0 31
Johan Moreno SD R Peoria 5.8 76.3 -14
Kannon Kemp SD R Peoria 6.0 72.4 -14
Maikel Miralles SD R Peoria 6.0 70.6 -14
Tanner Smith SD R Peoria 6.5 69.5 -17
Tucker Musgrove SD R Peoria 6.9 66.9 -17
Jimmy Kingsbury SEA R Peoria 5.9 58.5 -9
Marcelo Perez SEA R Peoria 5.8 66.7 -28
Ryan Hawks SEA R Peoria 6.3 59.6 -19
Stefan Raeth SEA R Peoria 6.1 68.8 -10
Tyler Cleveland SEA R Peoria 5.9 39.4 -51
Drey Jameson AZ R Salt River 5.5 71.0 -23
Kyle Amendt AZ R Salt River 7.2 80.2 7
Yordin Chalas AZ R Salt River 6.7 65.2 -23
Isaac Stebens BOS R Salt River 5.6 55.4 -23
Jay Allmer BOS R Salt River 6.0 64.9 -21
Jojo Ingrassia BOS L Salt River 6.6 66.2 40
Austin Smith COL R Salt River 7.1 67.5 -16
Ben Shields COL L Salt River 6.7 66.1 19
Cade Denton COL R Salt River 6.0 62.3 -27
Jack Mahoney COL R Salt River 6.1 67.9 -30
Welinton Herrera COL L Salt River 6.1 70.5 11
Benny Thompson LAA R Salt River 5.3 74.8 1
Brandon Dufault LAA R Salt River 6.1 65.0 -21
Fulton Lockhart LAA R Salt River 5.6 74.1 -12
Najer Victor LAA R Salt River 6.5 70.2 -25
Ryan Costeiu LAA R Salt River 5.9 71.4 -7
Carlson Reed PIT R Salt River 6.7 75.2 -20
Derek Diamond PIT R Salt River 6.7 68.4 -28
Dominic Perachi PIT L Salt River 6.0 74.9 24
Jaden Woods PIT L Salt River 6.9 68.2 25
Joshua Loeschorn PIT R Salt River 6.7 65.0 -18
David Hagaman TEX R Salt River 6.9 70.0 -15
Juan Sanchez SF R Scottsdale 5.9 61.1 -23
Carlos Lequerica DET R Scottsdale 6.6 72.3 -15
Dariel Fregio DET R Scottsdale 6.1 65.7 -24
Jake Miller DET L Scottsdale 6.1 68.2 29
Kenny Serwa DET R Scottsdale 6.3 66.1 -16
Anderson Brito HOU R Scottsdale 6.5 70.2 -12
Brett Gillis HOU R Scottsdale 6.6 70.1 -21
Derek True HOU R Scottsdale 6.5 73.9 -19
Hudson Leach HOU R Scottsdale 6.0 72.0 -21
James Hicks HOU R Scottsdale 5.7 66.1 -28
Nate Wohlgemuth HOU R Scottsdale 5.4 69.0 -17
Sean Paul Liñan LAD R Scottsdale 6.3 60.8 -26
Austin Troesser NYM R Scottsdale 6.7 73.8 -17
Brett Banks NYM R Scottsdale 6.3 70.7 -19
Jose T. Perez SF R Scottsdale 6.2 67.5 -16
Ricardo Estrada SF L Scottsdale 5.9 67.1 9
Austin Amaral WSH R Scottsdale 6.7 67.6 -16
Jake Bennett WSH L Scottsdale 7.1 67.4 31
Jared Simpson WSH L Scottsdale 6.1 68.3 12
Pablo Aldonis WSH L Scottsdale 6.1 68.7 19
Matt Jachec CLE R Shock 6.2 68.5 -30
Rorik Maltrud CLE R Shock 6.8 70.3 -17
Trenton Denholm CLE R Shock 6.1 66.6 -5
Zane Morehouse CLE R Shock 6.6 65.1 -23
A.J. Causey KC R Shock 5.7 54.8 -15
Dennis Colleran KC R Shock 6.6 59.5 -28
Hunter Owen KC L Shock 6.6 78.8 14
L.P. Langevin KC R Shock 5.3 62.2 -29
Logan Martin KC R Shock 6.4 72.8 -22
Anthony Flores MIL L Shock 5.9 61.8 22
Brett Wichrowski MIL R Shock 6.7 68.7 -24
Jesus Broca MIL L Shock 5.5 68.7 18
Nate Peterson MIL L Shock 5.8 69.3 13
Daniel Harper PHI R Shock 5.7 72.4 -19
Eiberson Castellano PHI R Shock 6.8 73.7 -19
Jack Dallas PHI R Shock 5.9 68.2 -36
Jaydenn Estanista PHI R Shock 6.4 77.8 -14
Tommy McCollum PHI R Shock 7.3 73.4 -13
Emiliano Teodo TEX R Shock 5.5 70.7 -14
Joey Danielson TEX R Shock 6.1 72.6 -27
Jose Corniell TEX R Shock 6.1 69.7 -19
Kolton Curtis TEX R Shock 6.7 68.1 -19
Winston Santos TEX R Shock 6.6 69.7 -25

Knowledge is from every pitcher’s most used fastball. Extension in ft (so 6.3 = 6’4″), launch knowledge in inches.



Supply hyperlink

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here