RVD acquired a ton of backlash for saying he had Raja Jackson’s again after Jackson brutally attacked Syko Stu and now the WWE Corridor of Famer has responded to the backlash and defended himself.
Whereas talking on the 1 of a Variety podcast, RVD responded to the criticism he acquired after saying he had Raja Jackson’s again following the assault on Syko Stu. He mentioned his feedback have been for individuals who truly needed to hear, not for trolls or folks spreading hate.
RVD defined that he nearly by no means blocks anybody, but when folks need to name him the dangerous man simply because he has a unique opinion, he’s fantastic with that. For him, having a unique view shouldn’t be handled like a criminal offense.
“Let me begin off by saying we’re right here for the individuals who truly need to hear what I’ve to say. In the event you don’t, and all you’re bringing is hate, disgust, and insults simply to troll, then this isn’t for you. I’ve most likely solely blocked ten folks since I’ve been on X. But when in your world I’m the satan simply because I don’t agree with you, then so be it. If having a unique opinion is the crime, I’ll stand on that. I can’t stay in a world the place disagreeing with somebody is handled like a criminal offense.”
RVD made it clear he isn’t defending Raja in court docket or paying for his life-style or authorized payments. All he did was make a remark, and a few folks twisted it. He known as this “fundamental pondering,” which means individuals who solely see issues a method and solely take into consideration the way it impacts them.
RVD mentioned this has occurred earlier than, pointing to how some nonetheless imagine he hates AEW simply due to their very own assumptions, not his intentions. He additionally talked about that folks accused him of claiming issues simply to advertise his podcast, however he defined that posting about matters is just to let folks know what’s arising, to not trigger drama.
“And let’s be clear—what have I truly achieved? Am I defending Raja in court docket? No. Am I paying his payments or his authorized charges? No. All I did was say one thing in a dialog. Some folks selected to interpret my phrases in another way, and that’s what I name fundamental pondering.
Right here’s what I imply by fundamental thinkers. They will solely maintain one thought of their head at a time. Like my canine. In the event you’re driving with them and one other automotive speeds previous, they’ll say, ‘What’s that man in such a rush for? Let’s field him in.’ However what I’m pondering is, perhaps he’s late for one thing necessary, perhaps he’s on a protracted journey, perhaps his spouse’s having a child. A fundamental thinker solely thinks about how one thing impacts them.
We’ve seen this earlier than. Primary thinkers nonetheless imagine I hate AEW, that I trash it, all due to their creativeness. They take their interpretation and act prefer it’s the one reality, no matter what the precise intention was. May my intention have been totally different than the way it was taken? After all. However apparently that doesn’t matter to fundamental thinkers.”
The Complete F’n Present additionally talked about cyberbullying, saying that sending hate to strangers on-line simply to attempt to damage them is likely one of the lowest issues an individual can do. He mentioned folks message him calling him names, however that doesn’t have an effect on him as a result of it gained’t change who he’s.
RVD believes bullies act this fashion as a result of they’re sad themselves and need to drag others down. To him, that form of habits is gross and one of many worst issues folks can do.
“Some even claimed that I made these feedback simply to draw folks to my podcast, like that’s some form of crime. I used to be merely letting folks know we have been going to have a dialog that others may additionally be concerned about. That’s why we submit about issues. If that’s a criminal offense by your values, then fantastic, decide me for one thing I truly did. However my values say cyberbullying—reaching out to folks you don’t even know simply to attempt to insult them and make them really feel dangerous—is likely one of the lowest types of habits.
I’ve had folks message me saying, ‘You’re a bit of s***.’ Do you assume that’s going to work? Do you assume I’m going to learn it and say, ‘Oh my god, you’re proper. I suck. Thanks for pointing it out.’ No. You’re not going to win me over. Your values let you know to convey folks down as a result of their happiness bothers you because you’re not as completely happy your self. And that’s the reality about bullying. That’s the motivation behind it. And to me, that’s simply gross. That’s one of many nastiest sorts of individuals.”
This comes after WWE Corridor of Famer Mark Henry truly blamed Syko Stu for your complete incident, saying that he shouldn’t have hit Raja Jackson with the beer can within the first place.
RVD has made it clear that he isn’t backing down from his phrases, insisting that disagreement shouldn’t be handled as a criminal offense. Whether or not followers agree with him or not, he’s standing agency in his perception that folks ought to assume past their very own views earlier than passing judgment and that’s not going to vary anytime quickly.
Do you assume RVD was proper to defend his feedback about Raja Jackson, or ought to he have distanced himself from the scenario solely? Hold forth within the feedback.
Please credit score Ringside Information in case you use the above transcript in your publication.