Rishabh Pant’s foot harm throughout the fourth Check at Outdated Trafford in Manchester led to debates on whether or not groups must be allowed harm substitutes.
Whereas India head coach Gautam Gambhir endorsed for such a transfer, England captain Ben Stokes referred to as the concept ‘ridiculous’, suggesting that such a legislation would introduce many loopholes for groups to use.
“I feel it’s completely ridiculous there’s a dialog round an harm substitute. There can be too many loopholes for a group to undergo. You decide an 11 for the sport, accidents are a part of it. I feel that dialog must be shut down,” Stokes stated.
Regardless of fracturing his foot and being suggested a six week’s relaxation, Pant walked out to bat in India’s first innings and went on to attain a half-century. Whereas the cricket fraternity lauded Pant’s efforts, it additionally led to dialogue on whether or not the ICC ought to provide you with a rule that allows a group to get in a substitute for a participant who sustained a significant harm.