England captain Jos Buttler emphasised that Harshit Rana’s inclusion as a concussion substitute was not solely accountable for England’s failure to cross the road and concede the collection. Nevertheless, Buttler made it clear that England disagreed with Rana being adjudged a like-for-like substitute for Shivam Dube.
“It’s not a like-for-like substitute, we don’t agree with that. Both Shivam Dube has placed on about 25mph with the ball, or Harshit has actually improved his batting. It’s a part of the sport. I nonetheless suppose we should always have gone on to win the match, however we disagree with the choice,” Buttler stated after India wrapped up the collection with a 15-run win on the Maharashtra Cricket Affiliation Stadium in Pune on Friday.
ALSO READ | Concussion Substitute guidelines defined – ICC taking part in situations
Buttler defined that the England crew was neither required to seek the advice of nor was it consulted earlier than the choice was made early on in the course of the chase. “There’s no session. As I got here out to bat, I used to be considering, who’s Harshit on for? And so they stated he’s the concussion substitute, which I clearly disagreed with, it’s not a like-for-like substitute,” Buttler stated.
“They stated that the match referee had made the choice, so we had no say in it or any a part of it. We are going to ask [match referee] Javagal (Srinath) some questions, simply to get some readability round it.”
Requested particularly whether or not it was extra of a case of an Impression Participant – an IPL rule – than a concussion substitute, Buttler supplied a tongue-in-cheek response. “Perhaps on the toss subsequent sport, I’ll say we’re going to play 12 as nicely,” he stated.
India’s bowling coach Morne Morkel, nonetheless, said that the concussion substitute was authorised by Srinath, suggesting there must be no debate round it.
“So far as I’m conscious, Shivam took the knock to the pinnacle, got here off the sphere, acquired the innings break with gentle headache signs. We took a reputation ahead to the match referee when it comes to an acceptable substitution, and from there it’s as much as the match referee to make that call. He made the choice,” Morkel stated.
“Harshit was having dinner, needed to get himself prepared as shortly as doable to get onto the sphere and bowl. And I assumed he did a superb job.”