World quantity two Iga Swiatek stated on Friday she was able to put a medication scandal behind her, insisting there was no purpose for the World Anti-Doping Company (WADA) to enchantment towards her case.
The 23-year-old Pole examined optimistic for the center medicine trimetazidine (TMZ) in an out-of-competition pattern in August when she was ranked primary.
Nevertheless, the Worldwide Tennis Integrity Company (ITIA) accepted that the violation was not intentional however handed her a one-month sanction that noticed her miss three tournaments in Asia and lose her high rating.
Information of the saga solely emerged in late November and she is going to play her first match since then on the mixed-teams United Cup in Sydney forward of the Australian Open subsequent month.
Swiatek stated that, whereas the incident had been “mentally powerful”, the general public response had been typically optimistic, allaying fears that she could be ostracised.
ALSO READ | Taylor Fritz motivated for Slam success after low-key low season
“I believe folks, most of them, are understanding,” stated the five-time Grand Slam champion.
“And those who learn the paperwork and are conscious of how the system works, they know that I had no fault and I had no affect on what was occurring.
“I attempt to simply go on with my life and concentrate on various things, concentrate on making ready for the season and on tennis, as a result of that is the perfect factor you are able to do after a case like that,” she stated.
Her case is much like that of Italian males’s world primary Jannik Sinner.
He was exonerated by the ITIA for twice testing optimistic for traces of the steroid clostebol in March. However WADA appealed towards the choice in September and he’s awaiting the result.
Swiatek stated she doesn’t anticipate WADA will observe the identical path together with her. “I gave each doable proof and there’s not a lot, truthfully, extra to do,” she stated.
“There isn’t any level to do an enchantment in our opinion.
“However, you recognize, I assume general, this complete course of was fairly summary typically and onerous to grasp from a perspective the place you don’t take into consideration the legislation and all the pieces.
“However truthfully, that is in regards to the legislation and the wording and this type of stuff. So I’m not anticipating an enchantment, however I’ve form of no affect on what’s going to occur.
“However I can say from the processes that I went via and the way they handled me from the start, that it appeared truthful for me,” she stated.
“I managed to offer the supply (of the contamination) fairly shortly. That’s why the case closed, fairly shortly.”